Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32080132›Full record

SynthesisMedicine2020

Accuracy of ADC derived from DWI for differentiating high-grade from low-grade gliomas: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Qiang-Ping Wang, De-Qiang Lei, Ye Yuan, Nan-Xiang Xiong

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. [Study of the Correlation Between MRI Parameters, Microvascular Density, and Prognosis in Glioma].Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Benign Glioma.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2023
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. MRI biomarkers in neuro-oncology.Nature reviews. Neurology · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Qiang-Ping WangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
De-Qiang Lei
Ye Yuan
Nan-Xiang Xiong

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveQuantitative apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) could be applied to grade gliomas. This meta-analysis was conducted to assess the accuracy of ADC analysis in differentiating high-grade (HGGs) from low-grade gliomas (LGGs).

methodsPubMed, Cochrane library, Science Direct, and Embase were searched to identify suitable studies up to September 1, 2018. The quality of studies was evaluated by the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies (QUADAS 2). We estimated the pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios (LR), diagnostic accuracy ratio (DOR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI), and determined the accuracy of the data by using the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) and calculating the area under the curve (AUC) to identity the accuracy of ADC analysis in grading gliomas.

resultsEighteen studies including 1172 patients were included and analyzed. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, PLR, NLR, DOR, and AUC with 95% CIs of DWI with b values of 1000 s/mm for separating HGGs from LGGs were 0.81 (95% CI 0.75-0.86), 0.87 (95% CI 0.81-0.91), 6.1 (95% CI 4.2-8.9), 0.22 (95% CI 0.17-0.29), 28 (95% CI 17-45), and 0.91 (95% CI 0.88-0.93), respectively. DWI with b values of 3000 s/mm showed slightly higher accuracy than that of 1000 (sensitivity 0.80, specificity 0.90 and AUC 0.92). Meta-regression analyses showed that field strengths and b values had significant impacts on diagnostic efficacy. Deeks testing confirmed no significant publication bias in all studies.

conclusionsThis meta-analysis suggested that ADC analysis of DWI have high accuracy in differentiating HGGs from LGGs. Standardized methodology is warranted to guide the use of this technique for clinical decision-making.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingGliomaHumansPredictive Value of TestsSensitivity and Specificity

Identifiers

PMID32080132
PMCPMC7034741

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.