SynthesisMedicine2020
Association between ABCB1 (3435C>T) polymorphism and susceptibility of colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Investigating the Impact of ABCB1 3435C>T (rs1045642) Variant on Severity and Cognitive Decline in Egyptian Alzheimer's Disease Patients.Molecular neurobiology · 2026Article
- The Interaction between Four Polymorphisms and Haplotype ofJournal of oncology · 2023Article
- Joint Analysis of Phenotypic and Genomic Diversity Sheds Light on the Evolution of Xenobiotic Metabolism in Humans.Genome biology and evolution · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Studies on the relationship between ABCB1 3435C>T polymorphism (rs1045642) and colorectal cancer (CRC)susceptibility have yielded inconclusive results. To clarify this issue, we undertook a meta-analysis to investigate the relationship between rs1045642 and CRC risk.Three electronic scientific publication databases (Cochrane Library, Pubmed, Embase) were screened using specific search terms. Relevant literature was identified using literature traceability methods. Selected publications were evaluated according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Effect size information (odds ratio and the corresponding 95% confidence interval [CI]) was obtained following quality assessment and data extraction from the included publications, and a meta-analysis conducted. Statistical analysis was performed with the Stata sofz (Version 13.0) software.Overall, 17 case-control studies involving 7129 CRC patients and 7710 healthy control subjects satisfied the criteria for inclusion in the meta-analysis. There was no significant association between ABCB1 3435C>T polymorphism and CRC risk in any of the genetic models. In the CC versus CT model (I = 20.9%, Pheterogeneity = .276), CC versus CT + TT model (I = 45.6%, Pheterogeneity = .102) and CT versus CC + TT model (I = 17.8%, Pheterogeneity = .298) analyses, between-study heterogeneities were detected as significant in Asian populations. In the CT versus TT model (I = 24%, Pheterogeneity = .254) and CC + CT versus TT model (I = 0, Pheterogeneity = .55), between-study heterogeneities were found to be significant in groups of different populations.The meta-analysis described here suggests that the ABCB1 3435C>T polymorphism is not related to CRC susceptibility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.