Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32079725›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2020

Mining gold from implicit models to improve likelihood-free inference.

Johann Brehmer, Gilles Louppe, Juan Pavez, Kyle Cranmer

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
12.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 164 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Generative models of morphogenesis in developmental biology.Seminars in cell & developmental biology · 2023
    Review
  6. Bagged filters for partially observed interacting systems.Journal of the American Statistical Association · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Consilience of methods for phylogenetic analysis of variance.Evolution; international journal of organic evolution · 2022
    Article
  9. Learning new physics from an imperfect machine.The European physical journal. C, Particles and fields · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. The frontier of simulation-based inference.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Johann BrehmerCenter for Cosmology and Particle Physics, New York University, New York, NY 10003; johann.brehmer@nyu.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-3344-4209
Gilles LouppeDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Liège, B-4000 Liège, Belgium.
Juan PavezFederico Santa María Technical University, Valparaíso, Chile.
Kyle CranmerCenter for Cosmology and Particle Physics, New York University, New York, NY 10003.ORCID 0000-0002-5769-7094
New York University · USFederico Santa María Technical University · CLUniversity of Liège · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Simulators often provide the best description of real-world phenomena. However, the probability density that they implicitly define is often intractable, leading to challenging inverse problems for inference. Recently, a number of techniques have been introduced in which a surrogate for the intractable density is learned, including normalizing flows and density ratio estimators. We show that additional information that characterizes the latent process can often be extracted from simulators and used to augment the training data for these surrogate models. We introduce several loss functions that leverage these augmented data and demonstrate that these techniques can improve sample efficiency and quality of inference.

Indexed as

implicit modelsneural density estimationsimulation-based inference

Identifiers

PMID32079725
PMCPMC7071889
OpenAlexW3006943238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.