Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32079560›Full record

SynthesisJournal of studies on alcohol and drugs. Supplement2020

Youth Cognitive Responses to Alcohol Promotional Messaging: A Systematic Review.

Elizabeth R Henehan, Ansley E Joannes, Liam Greaney, Susan Knoll, Qing Wai Wong, Craig S Ross

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs. Supplement, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Impact of food, beverage, and alcohol brand marketing on consumptive behaviors and health in children and adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. The Relationship Between Exposure to Alcohol Marketing and Underage Drinking Is Causal.Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs. Supplement · 2020
    Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Harmful Marketing: An Overlooked Social Determinant of Health.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Elizabeth R HenehanEpidemiology Department, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
Ansley E JoannesEpidemiology Department, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
Liam GreaneyEpidemiology Department, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
Susan KnollEpidemiology Department, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
Qing Wai WongEpidemiology Department, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
Craig S RossEpidemiology Department, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.

Funding

Alcohol Marketing and Underage DrinkingR01AA021347 · NIAAA · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI SARGENT, JAMES D. · 2013 to 2017
$2.9M
Supplement to Promote Diversity: Characterizing Low Alcohol Sensitivity in Laboratory and Real-World ContextsR01AA025451 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA · PI BARTHOLOW, BRUCE D, PIASECKI, THOMAS M · 2018 to 2022
$2.7M
Longitudinal Methodology and Alcohol UseK01AA013938 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA · PI JACKSON, KRISTINA MELIA · 2003 to 2007
$568k
NIAAA NIH HHS K01 AA013938NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA021347NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA025451
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis review examines the research of the effects of alcohol advertising on the cognitive mechanisms that precede underage alcohol use.

methodUsing PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, we reviewed 22 studies (1988-2016) selected from 22,040 articles. The final sample assessed cognitive responses of youth younger than the legal purchase age who were exposed to alcohol advertisements from television or magazines.

resultsThe studies were predominantly cross-sectional (59.1%), used convenience sampling (63.6%), had 74 to 3,521 participants, and were from six countries. The most common methods and applied theories for assessing advertising effects on cognitions were linear methods based on priming and modeling theories, and structural equation modeling based on information-processing models. Overall, advertising content appealed to youth, particularly advertisements that emphasized lifestyles of drinkers rather than the product quality. Youth exposed to alcohol advertisements were more likely to associate positive and arousing effects with alcohol, and in some studies effects were modified by sex, alcohol use, and age. Residual confounding and selection bias were a concern in the majority of studies.

conclusionsExposure to alcohol advertising may affect underage perceptions of risks and rewards of alcohol use. Nevertheless, the ability to draw causal conclusions is limited because of study designs. Future studies should use nonlinear methods to assess the association between advertising and cognitions and avoid measuring alcohol advertising as a uniform and dose-response exposure among diverse populations. Future research would be strengthened by applying consistent theoretical frameworks, improving control for confounding bias, and using validated cognitive outcome measures.

Indexed as

Alcoholic BeveragesAdolescentAdvertisingAge FactorsChildCognitionConsumer BehaviorCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleTelevisionUnderage Drinking

Identifiers

PMID32079560
PMCPMC7063996

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.