Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32079265›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis of the Effect of Resistance Training on Whole-Body Muscle Growth in Healthy Adult Males.

Pedro J Benito, Rocío Cupeiro, Domingo J Ramos-Campo, Pedro E Alcaraz, Jacobo Á Rubio-Arias

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05367648 (The Effect of Protein Hydrolysate Supplementation to Influence the Expression of Systemic Muscle Function Markers Following Resistance Type Exercise in Male Subjects), which is not on this map. Cited by 40 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05367648 nacompletednot on this map

The Effect of Protein Hydrolysate Supplementation to Influence the Expression of Systemic Muscle Function Markers Following Resistance Type Exercise in Male Subjects

TypeinterventionalSponsorNuritas LtdRan2020 to 2020Enrolled2ConditionsMuscle InjuryArmsElio, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Pedro J BenitoLFE Research Group, Department of Health and Human Performance. Faculty of Physical Activity and Sport Science-INEF. Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain.
Rocío CupeiroLFE Research Group, Department of Health and Human Performance. Faculty of Physical Activity and Sport Science-INEF. Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain.
Domingo J Ramos-CampoDepartment of Physical Activity and Sports Sciences, Faculty of Sports, UCAM, Catholic University San Antonio, 30107 Murcia, Spain.
Pedro E AlcarazDepartment of Physical Activity and Sports Sciences, Faculty of Sports, UCAM, Catholic University San Antonio, 30107 Murcia, Spain.
Jacobo Á Rubio-AriasLFE Research Group, Department of Health and Human Performance. Faculty of Physical Activity and Sport Science-INEF. Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain.
Universidad Católica de Murcia · ESUniversidad Politécnica de Madrid · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to study all published clinical trial interventions, determined the magnitude of whole-body hypertrophy in humans (healthy males) and observed the individual responsibility of each variable in muscle growth after resistance training (RT). Searches were conducted in PubMed, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library from database inception until 10 May 2018 for original articles assessing the effects of RT on muscle size after interventions of more than 2 weeks of duration. Specifically, we obtain the variables fat-free mass (FMM), lean muscle mass (LMM) and skeletal muscle mass (SMM). The effects on outcomes were expressed as mean differences (MD) and a random-effects meta-analysis and meta-regressions determined covariates (age, weight, height, durations in weeks…) to explore the moderate effect related to the participants and characteristics of training. One hundred and eleven studies (158 groups, 1927 participants) reported on the effects of RT for muscle mass. RT significantly increased muscle mass (FFM+LMM+SMM; Δ1.53 kg; 95% CI [1.30, 1.76],

Indexed as

Resistance TrainingAdultHumansMaleMuscle, SkeletalMuscle Strengthfat-free masshypertrophylean muscle massresistance trainingskeletal muscle mass

Identifiers

PMID32079265
PMCPMC7068252
OpenAlexW3006424500

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.