ArticlePlants (Basel, Switzerland)2020
A Molecular Phylogenetic Study of the Genus Phedimus for Tracing the Origin of "Tottori Fujita" Cultivars.
Article in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Molecular identification, phytochemical characterization, and bioactivity evaluation of the unexplored medicinal plant Phedimus hybridus.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Unraveling species diversification and niche separation in Phedimus Kamtschaticus and P. aizoon using RAD-seq data and ecological niche modeling.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Characteristics chloroplast genome of Yangxincai and correction of its Latin scientific name.Mitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2025Article
- Plastome-based backbone phylogeny of East AsianFrontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- Multispectral Phenotyping and Genetic Analyses of Spring Appearance in Greening Plant,Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.) · 2023Article
- PhytoKeys · 2022Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
It is very important to confirm and understand the genetic background of cultivated plants used in multiple applications. The genetic background is the history of crossing between maternal and paternal plants to generate a cultivated plant. If the plant in question was generated from a simple origin and not complicated crossing, we can easily confirm the history using a phylogenetic tree based on molecular data. This study was conducted to trace the origin of "Tottori Fujita 1gou" and "Tottori Fujita 2gou", which are registered as cultivars originating from Phedimus kamtschaticus. To investigate the phylogenetic position of these cultivars, the backbone tree of the genus Phedimus needed to be further constructed because it retains inarticulate phylogenetic relationships among the wild species. We performed molecular phylogenetic analysis for P. kamtschaticus, Phedimus takesimensis, Phedimus aizoon, and Phedimus middendorffianus, which are assumed as the species of origin for "Tottori Fujita 1gou" and "Tottori Fujita 2gou". The molecular phylogenetic tree based on the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) and psbA-trnH sequences showed the monophyly of the genus Phedimus, with P. takesimensis forming a single clade. However, P. kamtschaticus and P. aizoon were scattered in the tree. It was verified that "Tottori Fujita 1gou" and "Tottori Fujita 2gou" were embedded in a clade with P. takesimensis and not P. kamtschaticus. Therefore, origination from P. takesimensis was strongly supported. Based on these results, molecular phylogenetic analysis is suggested as a powerful tool for clearly tracing the origin of cultivated plants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.