Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32078818›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental research2020

Passive monitoring techniques to evaluate environmental pesticide exposure: Results from the Infant's Environmental Health study (ISA).

Leonel Córdoba Gamboa, Karla Solano Diaz, Clemens Ruepert, Berna van Wendel de Joode

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
7.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Microbiology and Biochemistry of Pesticides Biodegradation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. UV-Vis Activated CuNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. [Playful Learning: a tool for Environmental Education].Revista de ciencias ambientales = Tropical journal of environmental sciences
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Leonel Córdoba GamboaCentral American Institute for Studies on Toxic Substances (IRET), Universidad Nacional de Costa Rica, Heredia, 86-3000, Costa Rica. Electronic address: leonel.cordoba@gmail.com.
Karla Solano DiazCentral American Institute for Studies on Toxic Substances (IRET), Universidad Nacional de Costa Rica, Heredia, 86-3000, Costa Rica.
Clemens RuepertCentral American Institute for Studies on Toxic Substances (IRET), Universidad Nacional de Costa Rica, Heredia, 86-3000, Costa Rica.
Berna van Wendel de JoodeCentral American Institute for Studies on Toxic Substances (IRET), Universidad Nacional de Costa Rica, Heredia, 86-3000, Costa Rica.
Universidad Nacional · CR

Funding

Maintaining and enriching the Infants Environmental Health Study (ISA)R24ES028526 · NIEHS · NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY RALEIGH · PI HOPPIN, JANE, VAN WENDEL DE JOODE, BERNA · 2018 to 2022
$1.5M
NIEHS NIH HHS R24 ES028526
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPesticides used in agriculture may expose populations living nearby. Costa Rica is a major banana-exporting country, its production depends on extensive pesticide use.

objectivesTo evaluate environmental pesticide exposure, we measured levels of current-use pesticides in air and dust from 12 schools in Matina County, Costa Rica, with passive sampling methods.

methodsWe selected ten proximal and two non-proximal schools and placed polyurethane foam passive air samplers outdoors at each school, during four consecutive periods. At three of these schools, we also placed an active air sampler during the first 24 h of each sampling period. We collected passive dust samples by placing a glass Petri Dish at the inside of each school. We subsequently performed a chemical analysis of 18 pesticides, using gas chromatography with mass detector.

resultsWith passive air samplers we detected ten different pesticides: two insecticides, two nematicides, and six fungicides, of which nine reported to be used on banana plantations. More than half of the samples contained at least five pesticides. Chlorpyrifos was detected most-frequently, in 98% of samples, followed by the nematicides etoprophos and the fungicide pyrimethanil that were both detected in 81% of samples. Chlorpyrifos concentrations were five times higher in proximal as compared to non-proximal schools: mean = 18.2 ng/m DISCUSSION: Passive air sampling is a promising technique to characterize environmental exposure to current-use pesticides; more studies are needed to characterize the sampling rates, reproducibility and optimum sampling times for passive samplers. School environments near banana plantations are contaminated with multiple pesticides that include insecticides, nematicides, and fungicides, which is of concern.

Indexed as

ChlorpyrifosEnvironmental ExposurePesticidesCosta RicaEnvironmental HealthEnvironmental MonitoringHumansReproducibility of ResultsSchoolsChlorpyrifosPesticidesCosta RicaEnvironmental exposurePesticidesSchools

Identifiers

PMID32078818
PMCPMC7153910
OpenAlexW3005465739

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.