Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32078780›Full record

SynthesisAmerican journal of respiratory and critical care medicine2020

Natural History of Cognitive Impairment in Critical Illness Survivors. A Systematic Review.

Kimia Honarmand, Rajkamal S Lalli, Fran Priestap, Jennifer L Chen, Christopher W McIntyre, Adrian M Owen, Marat Slessarev

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 80 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
80citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

80 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. COVID-19 associated cognitive impairment: A systematic review.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2022
    Pooled it
  7. Changes in cognitive functioning after COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2022
    Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Profiles of Individuals With Long COVID Reporting Persistent Cognitive Complaints.Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists · 2025
    Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

20 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kimia HonarmandDepartment of Medicine.ORCID 0000-0002-7583-1445
Rajkamal S LalliDepartment of Pediatrics.
Fran PriestapDepartment of Medicine.
Jennifer L ChenDepartment of Medical Biophysics.
Christopher W McIntyreDepartment of Medicine.
Adrian M OwenBrain and Mind Institute, and.ORCID 0000-0002-5738-3765
Marat SlessarevDepartment of Medicine.ORCID 0000-0003-1181-0706

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Long-term cognitive impairment is common among ICU survivors, but its natural history remains unclear. In this systematic review, we report the frequency of cognitive impairment in ICU survivors across various time points after ICU discharge that were extracted from 46 of the 3,350 screened records. Prior studies used a range of cognitive instruments, including subjective assessments (10 studies), single or screening cognitive test such as Mini-Mental State Examination or Trail Making Tests A and B (23 studies), and comprehensive cognitive batteries (26 studies). The mean prevalence of cognitive impairment was higher with objective rather than subjective assessments (54% [95% confidence interval (CI), 51-57%] vs. 35% [95% CI, 29-41%] at 3 months after ICU discharge) and when comprehensive cognitive batteries rather than Mini-Mental State Examination were used (ICU discharge: 61% [95% CI, 38-100%] vs. 36% [95% CI, 15-63%]; 12 months after ICU discharge: 43% [95% CI, 10-78%] vs. 18% [95% CI, 10-20%]). Patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome had higher prevalence of cognitive impairment than mixed ICU patients at ICU discharge (82% [95% CI, 78-86%] vs. 48% [95% CI, 44-52%]). Although some studies repeated tests at more than one time point, the time intervals between tests were arbitrary and dictated by operational limitations of individual studies or chosen cognitive instruments. In summary, the prevalence and temporal trajectory of ICU-related cognitive impairment varies depending on the type of cognitive instrument used and the etiology of critical illness. Future studies should use modern comprehensive batteries to better delineate the natural history of cognitive recovery across ICU patient subgroups and determine which acute illness and treatment factors are associated with better recovery trajectories.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overCognitive DysfunctionCritical CareCritical IllnessFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrevalenceRisk AssessmentSurvivorscognition disorderscognitive dysfunctioncritical care outcomescritical illnesssurvivors

Identifiers

PMID32078780
PMCPMC7365360

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.