Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32078696›Full record

ReviewDer Nervenarzt2020

[A palliative concept for psychiatry? Conceptional considerations on advantages and limits of a close cooperation between palliative care and psychiatry].

Astrid Gieselmann, Jochen Vollmann

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Nervenarzt, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Palliative psychiatry in a narrow and in a broad sense: A concept clarification.The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Astrid GieselmannInstitut für Medizinische Ethik und Geschichte der Medizin, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Markstr. 258a, 44799, Bochum, Deutschland. astrid.gieselmann@rub.de.
Jochen VollmannInstitut für Medizinische Ethik und Geschichte der Medizin, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Markstr. 258a, 44799, Bochum, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA closer collaboration between psychiatry and palliative medicine is increasingly being discussed. This raises the question in which areas this collaboration already exists and which benefits it has for patient care.

objectiveTo ethically analyze the results of the application of palliative care concepts in psychiatry. MATERIAL AND

methodsEmpirically informed conceptual and ethical analysis.

resultsPalliative care and psychiatry share several basic principles. A collaboration between these disciplines already exists in certain areas. In relation to patients with persistent severe mental illnesses, this collaboration is limited to an awareness among professionals of certain concepts of palliative medicine.

conclusionA collaboration between psychiatry and palliative medicine can improve the quality of care, although this must vary across different patient groups.

Indexed as

Mental DisordersPalliative CarePsychiatryChronic DiseaseHumansInterdisciplinary CommunicationMental disordersPalliative medicinePalliative psychiatryPrognosisTherapy resistance

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.