Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32078681›Full record

ArticleBlood advances2020

The efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants in noncirrhotic portal vein thrombosis.

Leonard Naymagon, Douglas Tremblay, Nicole Zubizarreta, Erin Moshier, Kevin Troy, Thomas Schiano, John Mascarenhas

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Blood advances, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 89 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Effect of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Patients with Splanchnic Vein Thrombosis: A Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Endovascular Treatment for Acute Portal Vein Thrombosis.Interventional radiology (Higashimatsuyama-shi (Japan) · 2025
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Portal Vein Thrombosis: State-of-the-Art Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Leonard NaymagonTisch Cancer Institute.
Douglas TremblayTisch Cancer Institute.
Nicole ZubizarretaDepartment of Population Health Science and Policy/Tisch Cancer Institute, and.
Erin MoshierDepartment of Population Health Science and Policy/Tisch Cancer Institute, and.
Kevin TroyTisch Cancer Institute.
Thomas SchianoDivision of Liver Diseases, Recanati/Miller Transplantation Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY.
John MascarenhasTisch Cancer Institute.
Cancer Institute (WIA) · INIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · US

Funding

THE TISCH CANCER INSTITUTE - CANCER CENTER SUPPORT GRANTP30CA196521 · NCI · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI Ramon E Parsons · 2015 to 2026
$35.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA196521
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Guidelines currently favor vitamin K antagonists or low-molecular-weight heparins for treatment of noncirrhotic portal vein thrombosis (ncPVT). Use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in PVT has been met with concern because of the lack of data. We conducted a retrospective study to investigate the efficacy and safety of DOACs for the treatment of ncPVT, and to compare them with standard therapies: 330 patients with ncPVT, followed-up for a mean 41.6 months, received warfarin (n = 108), enoxaparin (n = 70), rivaroxaban (n = 65), apixaban (n = 20), dabigatran (n = 8), fondaparinux (n = 2), or no anticoagulation (n = 57). The primary outcome was complete radiographic resolution (CRR) of PVT. Secondary outcomes included recanalization of occlusive PVT, cavernous transformation of the PV, development of chronic portal hypertensive symptoms (cPHS), and major bleeding. DOACs were associated with the highest CRR rates (dabigatran, 6/8 [75%]; apixaban, 13/20 [65%]; rivaroxaban, 42/65 [65%]). Enoxaparin was associated with a CRR rate similar to that of the DOACs (40/70 = 57%). Warfarin was associated with worse outcomes in this regard (CRR rate, 31% [33/108]; hazard ratio [HR] DOACs:warfarin, 2.91; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.87-4.52; P < .0001). DOACs were associated with recanalization rates similar to enoxaparin and greater than warfarin (HR DOACs:warfarin, 3.45; 95% CI, 1.93-6.18; P < .0001). DOACs were associated with lower rates of cPHS, although this did not attain significance (DOACs, 8/93 [9%]; enoxaparin, 13/70 [19%]; warfarin, 31/108 [29%]). DOACs were associated with less major bleeding relative to warfarin (HR DOACs:warfarin, 0.20; 95% CI, 0.05-0.86; P = .0307). Patients harboring JAK2V617F, those with no evident predisposing factor for PVT, and those with occlusive thrombus demonstrated worse outcomes. DOACs appear effective and safe for the treatment of ncPVT.

Indexed as

Atrial FibrillationPortal VeinAdministration, OralAnticoagulantsHumansRetrospective StudiesAnticoagulants

Identifiers

PMID32078681
PMCPMC7042983
OpenAlexW3007355133

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.