Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32078646›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

'She convinced me'- partner involvement in choosing a high risk birth setting against medical advice in the Netherlands: A qualitative analysis.

Martine Hollander, Esteriek de Miranda, Anne-Marike Smit, Irene de Graaf, Frank Vandenbussche, Jeroen van Dillen, Lianne Holten

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Martine HollanderDepartment of Obstetrics, Radboud University Medical Center, Amalia Children's Hospital, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2279-086X
Esteriek de MirandaAcademic Medical Center, Department of Obstetrics, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Anne-Marike SmitAVAG School of Midwifery and Amsterdam UMC, VU/EMGO Research Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Irene de GraafAcademic Medical Center, Department of Obstetrics, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Frank VandenbusscheDepartment of Obstetrics, Radboud University Medical Center, Amalia Children's Hospital, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Jeroen van DillenDepartment of Obstetrics, Radboud University Medical Center, Amalia Children's Hospital, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Lianne HoltenAVAG School of Midwifery and Amsterdam UMC, VU/EMGO Research Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Radboud University Nijmegen · NLAmsterdam Public Health · NLAmsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Home births in high risk pregnancies and unassisted childbirth seem to be increasing in the Netherlands. There is a lack of qualitative data on women's partners' involvement in these choices in the Dutch maternity care system, where integrated midwifery care and home birth are regular options in low risk pregnancies. The majority of available literature focuses on the women's motivations, while the partner's influence on these decisions is much less well understood. We aimed to examine partners' involvement in the decision to birth outside the system, in order to provide medical professionals with insight and recommendations regarding their interactions with these partners in the outpatient clinic. An exploratory qualitative research design with a constructivist approach and a grounded theory method were used. In-depth interviews were performed with twenty-one partners on their involvement in the decision to go against medical advice in choosing a high risk childbirth setting. Open, axial and selective coding of the interview data was done in order to generate themes. Four main themes were found: 1) Talking it through, 2) A shared vision, 3) Defending our views, and 4) Doing it together. One overarching theme emerged that covered all other themes: 'She convinced me'. These data show that the idea to choose a high risk birth setting almost invariably originated with the women, who did most of the research online, filtered the information and convinced the partners of the merit of their plans. Once the partners were convinced, they took a very active and supportive role in defending the plan to the outside world, as well as in preparing for the birth. Maternity care providers can use these findings in cases where there is a discrepancy between the wishes of the woman and the advice of the professional, so they can attempt to involve partners actively during consultations in pregnancy. That will ensure that partners also receive information on all options, risks and benefits of possible birth choices, and that they are truly in support of a final plan.

Indexed as

Directive CounselingHome ChildbirthMaternal Health ServicesMidwiferyAdultBirth SettingChoice BehaviorFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNetherlandsParturitionPublic Health SurveillanceQualitative ResearchRisk AssessmentYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID32078646
PMCPMC7032726
OpenAlexW3008206800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.