ArticlePloS one2020
Characterization of gut microbiomes of household pets in the United States using a direct-to-consumer approach.
Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
39 citing papers in PubMed.
- Gut microbiome alterations in canine idiopathic epilepsy: a pairwise case-control study.Animal microbiome · 2026Article
- Gut Microbiome Alterations in Canine Idiopathic Epilepsy: A Pairwise Case-Control Study.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- From conventional probiotics to precision nutrition: host-specific probiotics in canine and feline functional foods.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026Review
- Linking shelter conditions to health: A multisystem analysis of stress, metabolism, and fecal microbiota in dogs.PloS one · 2026Article
- The gut microbiota of Labrador retriever puppies: a longitudinal cohort study.Animal microbiome · 2025Article
- Gut microbiota composition is related to anxiety and aggression scores in companion dogs.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Nutritional and Microbiome Effects of a Partial Substitution of Poultry Meat with Hydrolyzed Feather Meal in Dog Diets.Microorganisms · 2025Article
- A bi-variate framework to model microbiome resilience in healthy dogs.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025Article
- Effects of diet type on the core fecal bacterial taxa and the dysbiosis index of healthy adult dogs.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025Article
- Continuous intake of galacto-oligosaccharides containing syrup contributes to maintaining the health of household cats by modulating their gut microbiota.Bioscience of microbiota, food and health · 2025Article
- Gut Microbiota Comparison in Rectal Swabs Versus Stool Samples in Cats with Kidney Stones.Microorganisms · 2024Article
- Article
- A Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Impact of a Novel Probiotic and Nutraceutical Supplement on Pruritic Dermatitis and the Gut Microbiota in Privately Owned Dogs.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024Article
- Effects of supplementation of live and heat-treated Bifidobacterium animalis subspecies lactis CECT 8145 on glycemic and insulinemic response, fecal microbiota, systemic biomarkers of inflammation, and white blood cell gene expression of adult dogs.Journal of animal science · 2024Article
- Article
- Species-level characterization of the core microbiome in healthy dogs using full-length 16S rRNA gene sequencing.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2024Article
- Comparison of the fecal microbiota of adult healthy dogs fed a plant-based (vegan) or an animal-based diet.Frontiers in microbiology · 2024Article
- Analysis of the gut microbiome in sled dogs reveals glucosamine- and activity-related effects on gut microbial composition.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2024Article
- Validation of method for faecal sampling in cats and dogs for faecal microbiome analysis.BMC veterinary research · 2023Article
- Characterization and Description of the Fecal Microbiomes of Pet Domestic Ferrets (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The role of gut microbiomes as important regulators of mammalian health is increasingly recognized, although feline and canine gut microbiomes remain poorly characterized. In this proof-of-concept study, we assessed the utility of a direct-to-consumer approach to executing pet microbiome studies. We characterized the gut microbiomes of 238 pets (46 cats and 192 dogs) by generating ~11 million merged reads that were mapped to the V4 region of 16S ribosomal RNA gene at a sequencing depth of 45,806 (±22,325) reads per sample. Analyses of these reads revealed that both feline and canine gut microbiomes are dominated by three major phyla, namely Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, and Bacteroides and that alpha diversity is higher in the feline gut. In addition to interspecies differences between the feline and canine gut, we also detected appreciable intraspecies bacterial variation within the canine population. While the dogs in this dataset could be assigned to three distinct clusters based on their gut microbiome, no clustering was observed within the feline population. Integration of additional data obtained from survey questionnaires revealed that geography and body weight may be associated with canine gut microbiome composition. Furthermore, we found that both the inter and intraspecies differences are more pronounced at finer taxonomic levels, indicating that strain-level investigations may be necessary in the future. This study demonstrates that the direct-to-consumer approach overcomes existing limitations in pet microbiome research, for example, it allows collection of large numbers of pet samples. The direct-to-consumer approach has proven successful in human genomics as well as human microbiomics and this study demonstrates that by building partnerships with an engaged general public this approach can also propel the field of pet microbiomics forward.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.