Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32078625›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Characterization of gut microbiomes of household pets in the United States using a direct-to-consumer approach.

Aashish R Jha, Justin Shmalberg, Jirayu Tanprasertsuk, LeeAnn Perry, Dan Massey, Ryan W Honaker

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Aashish R JhaResearch & Development Division, NomNomNow, Inc., Oakland, California, United State of America.ORCID 0000-0003-3227-1086
Justin ShmalbergResearch & Development Division, NomNomNow, Inc., Oakland, California, United State of America.
Jirayu TanprasertsukResearch & Development Division, NomNomNow, Inc., Oakland, California, United State of America.ORCID 0000-0001-6203-3797
LeeAnn PerryResearch & Development Division, NomNomNow, Inc., Oakland, California, United State of America.
Dan MasseyResearch & Development Division, NomNomNow, Inc., Oakland, California, United State of America.
Ryan W HonakerResearch & Development Division, NomNomNow, Inc., Oakland, California, United State of America.ORCID 0000-0003-3459-628X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The role of gut microbiomes as important regulators of mammalian health is increasingly recognized, although feline and canine gut microbiomes remain poorly characterized. In this proof-of-concept study, we assessed the utility of a direct-to-consumer approach to executing pet microbiome studies. We characterized the gut microbiomes of 238 pets (46 cats and 192 dogs) by generating ~11 million merged reads that were mapped to the V4 region of 16S ribosomal RNA gene at a sequencing depth of 45,806 (±22,325) reads per sample. Analyses of these reads revealed that both feline and canine gut microbiomes are dominated by three major phyla, namely Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, and Bacteroides and that alpha diversity is higher in the feline gut. In addition to interspecies differences between the feline and canine gut, we also detected appreciable intraspecies bacterial variation within the canine population. While the dogs in this dataset could be assigned to three distinct clusters based on their gut microbiome, no clustering was observed within the feline population. Integration of additional data obtained from survey questionnaires revealed that geography and body weight may be associated with canine gut microbiome composition. Furthermore, we found that both the inter and intraspecies differences are more pronounced at finer taxonomic levels, indicating that strain-level investigations may be necessary in the future. This study demonstrates that the direct-to-consumer approach overcomes existing limitations in pet microbiome research, for example, it allows collection of large numbers of pet samples. The direct-to-consumer approach has proven successful in human genomics as well as human microbiomics and this study demonstrates that by building partnerships with an engaged general public this approach can also propel the field of pet microbiomics forward.

Indexed as

AnimalsBacteriaCatsDogsGastrointestinal MicrobiomePhylogenyPhylogeographyProof of Concept StudyRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited StatesRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID32078625
PMCPMC7032713

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.