ArticleIEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering2020
Accounting for Deformation in Deep Brain Stimulation Surgery With Models: Comparison to Interventional Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Article in IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Model-based image updating in deep brain stimulation with assimilation of deep brain sparse data.Medical physics · 2023Article
- Modelling glioma progression, mass effect and intracranial pressure in patient anatomy.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2022Article
- Microwave ablation of lung tumors: A probabilistic approach for simulation-based treatment planning.Medical physics · 2021Article
- Impact of brain shift on neural pathways in deep brain stimulation: a preliminary analysis via multi-physics finite element models.Journal of neural engineering · 2021Article
- A neutrosophic explainable AI framework for modeling uncertainty in immersive stereotactic neurosurgical simulation.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The efficacy of deep brain stimulation (DBS) depends on electrode placement accuracy, which can be jeopardized by brain shift due to burr hole and dura opening during surgery. Brain shift violates assumed rigid alignment between preoperative image and intraoperative anatomy, negatively impacting therapy.
objectiveThis study presents a deformation-atlas biomechanical model-based approach to address shift.
methodsSix patients, who underwent interventional magnetic resonance (iMR) image-guided DBS burr hole surgery, were studied. A patient-specific model was employed under varying surgical conditions, generating a collection of possible intraoperative shift estimations or a 'deformation atlas.' An inverse problem was driven by sparse measurements derived from iMR to determine an optimal fit of solutions of the atlas. This fit was then used to obtain a volumetric deformation field, which was utilized to update preoperative MR and estimate shift at surgical target region localized on iMR. Model performance was examined by quantitatively comparing intraoperative subsurface measurements to their model-predicted counterparts, and qualitatively comparing iMR, preoperative MR, and model updated MR. A nonrigid image registration was introduced as a comparator.
resultsModel-based approach reduced general parenchyma shift from 8.2 ± 2.2 to 2.7 ± 1.1 mm (∼66.8% correction), and produced updated MR with better agreement to iMR than that of preoperative MR. The average model estimated shift at target region was 1.2 mm.
conclusionsThis study demonstrates the feasibility of a model-based shift correction strategy in DBS surgery with only sparse data. SIGNIFICANCE: The developed strategy has the potential to complement and/or enhance current clinical approaches in addressing shift.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.