Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32078517›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association

Clinical Utility of Multisensory Environments for People With Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities: A Scoping Review.

Lauren Breslin, Nichole Guerra, Lori Ganz, David Ervin

Open access · bronzeAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Snoezelen in people with intellectual disability or dementia: A systematic review.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lauren BreslinLauren Breslin, BS, is Medical Student, Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Rochester, MN; Breslin.lauren@mayo.edu.
Nichole GuerraNichole Guerra, MS, DBA, is Director, Research Center, The Resource Exchange, Colorado Springs, CO.
Lori GanzLori Ganz, MS, OTR/L, is Director, Clinical Services, The Resource Exchange, Colorado Springs, CO.
David ErvinDavid Ervin, MA, is CEO, Jewish Foundation for Group Homes, Rockville, MD.
Mayo Clinic in Arizona · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importanceAdults with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) are twice as likely as their peers without disabilities to have had a physical exam in the past year; however, as a result of challenging behavior during office visits, they are significantly less likely to have received recommended health screenings. Challenging behaviors in clinical settings have been identified as a barrier to providing adequate care for this population.

objectiveThis scoping review examined the within-session effects of multisensory environments (MSEs) on people with IDD to determine the clinical utility of MSEs for this population. DATA SOURCES: Studies published between January 1, 2000, and August 1, 2018, were identified using Summon and Google Scholar. STUDY SELECTION: Studies were included in the review if they systematically collected and reported data on within-session effects of an MSE intervention on people with IDD.

findingsThirteen studies met criteria for this review: 4 with Level I evidence, 2 with Level II evidence, 3 with Level III evidence, and 4 with Level IV evidence. Studies examined the effects of MSEs on maladaptive behaviors, positive behaviors, distress and discomfort, activity and alertness states, and cost of care for people with IDD. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: Preliminary support was found for the use of MSEs in clinical settings to reduce anxiety and challenging behaviors in patients with IDD during clinical care. Further research is needed to determine the efficacy of MSEs for producing the effects described in this review. WHAT THIS ARTICLE ADDS: The findings support the potential of MSEs as a tool that occupational therapy practitioners can use to support their clients with IDD who have sensory sensitivities in clinical settings. This article also highlights a multidisciplinary approach whereby medical providers and occupational therapy practitioners could work together in nontraditional ways to support this population.

Indexed as

Intellectual DisabilityOccupational TherapyPersons with DisabilitiesAdultChildDevelopmental DisabilitiesHumans

Identifiers

PMID32078517
PMCPMC7018453
OpenAlexW2998455570

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.