Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32078234›Full record

ArticleLiver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver2020

Optimization of hepatitis C virus screening strategies by birth cohort in Italy.

Loreta A Kondili, Ivane Gamkrelidze, Sarah Blach, Andrea Marcellusi, Massimo Galli, Salvatore Petta, Massimo Puoti, Stefano Vella, Homie Razavi, Antonio Craxi and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Evaluation of the hepatitis c virus screening program in the Marche Region (Italy): experience from the Pesaro-Urbino health authority.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Hepatitis C Screening: A Health Technology Assessment.Ontario health technology assessment series · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Screening strategy to advance HCV elimination in Italy: a cost-consequence analysis.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Opportunistic co-screening for HCV and COVID-19-related services: A creative response with a need for thoughtful reflection.Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2022
    Article
  19. Implementation of HCV screening in the 1969-1989 birth-cohort undergoing COVID-19 vaccination.Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Loreta A KondiliCenter for Global Health, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2656-224X
Ivane GamkrelidzeCenter for Disease Analysis Foundation, Lafayette, CO, US.ORCID 0000-0003-3843-670X
Sarah BlachCenter for Disease Analysis Foundation, Lafayette, CO, US.ORCID 0000-0002-9252-7576
Andrea MarcellusiCentre for Economic and International Studies, Faculty of Economics, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3974-3798
Massimo GalliDepartment of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, "L Sacco" University of Milan, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8887-6215
Salvatore PettaGastroenterology and Liver Unit, PROMISE, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0822-9673
Massimo PuotiDepartment of Infectious Diseases, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3278-7138
Stefano VellaCenter for Global Health, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2347-5984
Homie RazaviCenter for Disease Analysis Foundation, Lafayette, CO, US.ORCID 0000-0002-2658-6930
Antonio CraxiGastroenterology and Liver Unit, PROMISE, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4480-9544
Francesco S MenniniCentre for Economic and International Studies, Faculty of Economics, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4738-5505
PITER collaborating group
Center for Disease Analysis · USIstituto Superiore di Sanità · ITUniversity of Palermo · ITUniversity of Rome Tor Vergata · ITAzienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda · ITUniversity of Milan · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsCost-effective screening strategies are needed to make hepatitis C virus (HCV) elimination a reality. We determined if birth cohort screening is cost-effective in Italy.

methodsA model was developed to quantify screening and healthcare costs associated with HCV. The model-estimated prevalence of undiagnosed HCV was used to calculate the antibody screens needed annually, with a €25 000 cost-effectiveness threshold. Outcomes were assessed under the status quo and a scenario that met the World Health Organization's targets for elimination of HCV. The elimination scenario was assessed under five screening strategies.

resultsA graduated birth cohort screening strategy (graduated screening 1: 1968-1987 birth cohorts, then expanding to 1948-1967 cohorts) was the least costly. This strategy would gain approximately 144 000 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) by 2031 and result in an 89.3% reduction in HCV cases, compared to an 89.6%, 89.0%, 89.7% and 88.7% reduction for inversed graduated screening, 1948-77 birth cohort, 1958-77 birth cohort and universal screening, respectively. Graduated screening 1 yielded the lowest incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of €3552 per QALY gained.

conclusionsIn Italy, a graduated screening scenario is the most cost-effective strategy. Other countries could consider a similar birth cohort approach when developing HCV screening strategies.

Indexed as

Hepatitis CHepatitis C, ChronicAntiviral AgentsCost-Benefit AnalysisHepacivirusHumansItalyMass ScreeningQuality-Adjusted Life YearsAntiviral Agentscost-effectivenessHCVscreeningWHO targets

Identifiers

PMID32078234
PMCPMC7384106
OpenAlexW3008222967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.