Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32078145›Full record

Trial reportBioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy2020

Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Adalimumab (Humira) and the Adalimumab Biosimilar Candidate (HS016) in Chinese Patients with Active Ankylosing Spondylitis: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel, Phase III Clinical Trial.

Jinmei Su, Mengtao Li, Lan He, Dongbao Zhao, Weiguo Wan, Yi Liu, Jianhua Xu, Jian Xu, Huaxiang Liu, Lindi Jiang and 20 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Guideline
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

30 authors at 20 institutions in 1 country.

Jinmei SuDepartment of Rheumatology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, No. 1 Shuaifuyuan, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China.
Mengtao LiDepartment of Rheumatology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, No. 1 Shuaifuyuan, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China.
Lan HeDepartment of Rheumatology and Immunology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710061, China.
Dongbao ZhaoDepartment of Rheumatology, Changhai Hospital, Shanghai, 200433, China.
Weiguo WanDepartment of Rheumatology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 201907, China.
Yi LiuDepartment of Rheumatology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610000, China.
Jianhua XuDepartment of Rheumatology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, 230001, China.
Jian XuDepartment of Rheumatology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, 650032, China.
Huaxiang LiuDepartment of Rheumatology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, 250001, China.
Lindi JiangDepartment of Rheumatology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Huaxiang WuDepartment of Rheumatology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, 310009, China.
Xiaoxia ZuoDepartment of Rheumatology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410008, China.
Cibo HuangDepartment of Rheumatology, Beijing Hospital, Beijing, 100010, China.
Xiumei LiuDepartment of Rheumatology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, 30001, China.
Fen LiDepartment of Rheumatology, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, 410007, China.
Zhiyi ZhangDepartment of Rheumatology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, 150001, China.
Xiangyuan LiuDepartment of Rheumatology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, 100089, China.
Lingli DongDepartment of Rheumatology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, China.
Tianwang LiDepartment of Rheumatology, Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital, Guangzhou, 510310, China.
Haiying ChenDepartment of Rheumatology, The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, 050000, China.
Jingyang LiDepartment of Rheumatology, Zhuzhou Central Hospital, Zhuzhou, 412000, China.
Dongyi HeDepartment of Rheumatology, Shanghai Guanghua Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Shanghai, 200052, China.
Xin LuDepartment of Rheumatology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, 100020, China.
Anbin HuangDepartment of Rheumatology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, China.
Yi TaoDepartment of Rheumatology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510260, China.
Yanyan WangDepartment of Rheumatology, Jiangsu Province Hospital, Nanjing, 210000, China.
Zhuoli ZhangDepartment of Rheumatology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, 100034, China.
Wei WeiDepartment of Rheumatology, Tianjian Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, 300052, China.
Xiaofeng LiDepartment of Rheumatology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, 030001, China.
Xiaofeng ZengDepartment of Rheumatology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, No. 1 Shuaifuyuan, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China. zengxfpumc@163.com.
Peking University · CNAnhui Medical University · CNBeijing Hospital · CNCentral South University · CNChina-Japan Friendship Hospital · CNChinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University · CNFudan University · CNGuangdong Provincial People's Hospital · CNHuazhong University of Science and Technology · CNJiangsu Province Hospital · CNMinistry of Education of the People's Republic of China · CNNational Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases · CNPeking University First Hospital · CNQilu Hospital of Shandong University · CNSecond Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University · CNSecond Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University · CNSecond Military Medical University · CNShanghai Guanghua Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine · CNShanxi Medical University · CN

Funding

Chinese National Key Technology R&D Program, Ministry of Science and Technology 2017YFC0907601Medicine and Health Technology Innovation Project, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences 2019-I2M-2-008
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the biosimilar candidate of adalimumab (HS016) compared with adalimumab (Humira) for the treatment of active ankylosing spondylitis.

methodsA multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel, positive control, phase III clinical trial was conducted at 28 locations in China. Patients with active ankylosing spondylitis were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to subcutaneously receive 40 mg of either HS016 or adalimumab every other week for 24 weeks. The primary endpoint was to achieve at least a 20% improvement (ASAS20) in patients at 24 weeks according to the Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society criteria. The secondary endpoint included other efficacy assessment parameters, health evaluations, safety, pharmacokinetic, and immunogenicity parameters.

resultsFollowing the random assignment of 648 patients into HS016 (n = 416) and adalimumab (n = 232) groups, no significant difference was found in the ASAS20 response rates at 24 weeks between the HS016 (364/416, 87.5%) and adalimumab (209/232, 90.1%) treatments and the difference between the response rates (- 2.59%; 90% confidence interval [CI] - 6.77 to 1.60) was within the predefined equivalence margin (± 15%). There were also no significant differences when the secondary endpoints were compared (all p > 0.05). Similarly, the rates of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were not significantly different between the two groups, with most TEAEs being mild to moderate. Only nine severe cases were found, including seven within the HS016 group, three (0.7%) of which were tuberculosis cases. Plasma concentrations of HS016 and adalimumab from weeks 12 to 14 were similar during the steady-state period and steady-state maximal concentration (C

conclusionHS016 resembled adalimumab in efficacy and safety over the 24-week treatment period. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ChiCTR1900022520.

Indexed as

AdalimumabAdultAnti-Inflammatory AgentsAsian PeopleBiosimilar PharmaceuticalsDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleSeverity of Illness IndexSpondylitis, AnkylosingTherapeutic EquivalencyTreatment OutcomeTumor Necrosis Factor-alphaYoung AdultAdalimumabadalimumab biosimilar HS016Anti-Inflammatory AgentsBiosimilar PharmaceuticalsTumor Necrosis Factor-alpha

Identifiers

PMID32078145
PMCPMC7211209
OpenAlexW3007138247

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.