Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32078134›Full record

ArticleInternational ophthalmology2020

Outcomes of Ahmed glaucoma valve FP8 versus FP7 in adult secondary glaucoma.

S Ramyashri, Niranjan Raj, Amiya Pradhan, Mohammad Hasnat Ali, Aparna Rao

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International ophthalmology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

S RamyashriGlaucoma Services, L. V. Prasad Eye Institute, Patia, Bhubaneswar, India.
Niranjan RajGlaucoma Services, L. V. Prasad Eye Institute, Patia, Bhubaneswar, India.
Amiya PradhanGlaucoma Services, L. V. Prasad Eye Institute, Patia, Bhubaneswar, India.
Mohammad Hasnat AliDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology and Bio-Statistics, L. V. Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, India.
Aparna RaoGlaucoma Services, L. V. Prasad Eye Institute, Patia, Bhubaneswar, India. aparna@lvpei.org.
L V Prasad Eye Institute · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo compare the outcomes of Ahmed glaucoma valve (AGV) pediatric FP8 versus the large-sized adult FP7 implants in an adult secondary glaucoma.

methodsPatients who underwent AGV implantation from January 2011 to December 2016 for adult secondary glaucoma (due to causes other than post-vitreoretinal/buckle surgery glaucoma) with a follow-up of 6 months were included for this retrospective study. Success was defined as IOP > 6 mm Hg and < 21 mm Hg without any loss of vision, with or without the need of anti-glaucoma medications or additional procedures for control of IOP. Hypertensive phase was defined as IOP > 21 mmHg at any visit in the first 6 months of postoperative follow-up period, while failure was defined as IOP > 21 mm Hg even after medications or additional procedures, need of removal of implant or loss of light perception. Cumulative survival rates and intraoperative or postoperative complications along with IOP profiles were compared between the implants.

resultsOf 43 patients, 19 patients underwent FP7 and 24 patients underwent FP8 Ahmed Glaucoma valve implantation. The IOP significantly reduced in both groups from baseline (31 ± 8.2 mm Hg in FP7 eyes and 37 ± 13.1 mm Hg in FP8 eyes) by a mean of 64 ± 23.5% in FP8 and 64 ± 21.5% in FP7 group, respectively, p = 0.8 with comparable final IOP of 16.5 mm Hg and 16.9 mm Hg, respectively, p = 0.9. Both groups had 75% qualified success rates at 20 months after surgery with similar rates of need for postoperative medications or incidence of hypertensive phase. The FP8 eyes had more frequent conjunctiva-related complications in eyes with prior surgeries and preoperative conjunctival scarring while the other complications were similar in the two groups.

conclusionSurgical outcomes of adult FP7 and pediatric FP8 AGV in adult secondary glaucoma seem to achieve similar IOP control and success rates. This suggests that smaller-sized FP8 can be used in adult glaucoma with good surgical outcomes albeit with careful case selection in eyes with extensive preoperative scarring to avoid conjunctival thinning-related complications postoperatively.

Indexed as

Glaucoma Drainage ImplantsVisual AcuityAdultFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGlaucomaHumansIntraocular PressureMaleMiddle AgedProsthesis DesignRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAhmed glaucoma valveGlaucoma drainage deviceHypertensive phaseIntraocular pressureValved implants

Identifiers

PMID32078134
OpenAlexW3007062846

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.