ArticleProbiotics and antimicrobial proteins2020
Enterocin Structural Gene Screening in Enterococci from Pannon White Breed Rabbits.
Article in Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Fecal strains Enterococcus mundtii from wild ruminants, their safety and postbiotic potential.Veterinary research communications · 2025Article
- Screening of bacteriocin-producing dairyFrontiers in microbiology · 2023Article
- Effect of enterocins against methicillin-resistant animal-derived staphylococci.Veterinary research communications · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study was focused on screening the most frequently occurring enterocin (Ents) genes in faecal enterococci from the Pannon White breed of rabbits, in which this parameter never has been tested. Enterococci tested were Ent genes absent, except Enterococcus faecium EF9a, which possessed genes for four Ents. Strains produced a high amount of lactic acid (1.25 ± 0.055 mmol/L, on average) and sufficiently tolerate bile. Inhibition activity of crude bacteriocin substance-partially purified (Ent, CE EF9a)-was tested against altogether 53 indicator strains. The growth of 38 strains of different staphylococcal species was not inhibited. However, the growth of fifteen other Gram-positive indicators was inhibited with inhibition activity ranged from 100 to 12,800 AU/mL. Listeria monocytogenes LM 7562 was the most susceptible to CE EF9a treatment (12,800 AU/mL). Molecular mass of CE EF9a ranged between 3000 and 10,000 Da. After heat treatment at different temperatures and time, CE EF9a was active with the inhibition activity 12,800 AU/mL. After storage of CE EF9a at different conditions, it was active even after 2-month storage at room temperature (200 AU/mL against LM 7562 strain). Inhibition activity of CE EF9a after 2-month storage at 4 °C was 1600 AU/mL and the most stable was CE EF9a at - 20 °C; the activity 12,800 AU/mL was kept still after 2 months. It indicates a small, thermostable substance; however, in further detail, purification analysis is necessary.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.