ArticleJournal of medical ultrasonics (2001)2020
Improvement of performance of minimum variance beamformer by introducing cross covariance estimate.
Article in Journal of medical ultrasonics (2001), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Minimum variance beamforming combined with covariance matrix-based adaptive weighting for medical ultrasound imaging.Biomedical engineering online · 2022Article
- On the publication of the special feature on recent progress in basic research useful for the interpretation of ultrasound diagnostic images.Journal of medical ultrasonics (2001) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe delay-and-sum beamformer is widely used in clinical ultrasound systems to obtain ultrasonic images. To improve image quality, the minimum variance (MV) beamformer was introduced in medical ultrasound imaging. The MV beamformer determines beamformer weights from ultrasonic echo signals received by individual transducer elements in an ultrasonic probe. In the present study, the MV beamformer was investigated to improve its performance.
methodsIn MV beamforming, a covariance matrix of echo signals received by individual elements needs to be estimated to obtain adaptive beamformer weights. To obtain a stable estimate, a total receiving aperture is divided into subarrays, and a covariance matrix is obtained using echo signals from each subarray to average covariance matrices from all subarrays. This procedure is called "subarray averaging." In the present study, a new method for estimation of the covariance matrix was proposed. In the proposed method, a covariance matrix, namely, a cross covariance matrix, is obtained using echo signals from different subarrays. Multiple covariance matrices are obtained from all different pairs of subarrays and averaged.
resultsIn the present study, the performance of the proposed method was evaluated by basic experiments on a phantom. Lateral spatial resolutions obtained by MV beamforming with conventional subarray averaging and the proposed method were similar. However, contrast obtained by MV beamforming with the proposed method was - 0.56 dB, which was significantly better than the - 5.06 dB obtained by MV beamforming with conventional subarray averaging.
conclusionImage contrast in MV beamforming could be improved significantly by estimating "cross" covariance matrices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.