Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32078052›Full record

ArticleJournal of bone and mineral metabolism2020

Role of embryonic origin on osteogenic potential and bone repair capacity of rat calvarial osteoblasts.

Alann Thaffarell Portilho Souza, Helena Bacha Lopes, Gileade Pereira Freitas, Emanuela Prado Ferraz, Fabiola Singaretti Oliveira, Adriana Luisa Gonçalves Almeida, Denise Weffort, Marcio Mateus Beloti, Adalberto Luiz Rosa

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of bone and mineral metabolism, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Silk-Based Materials for Hard Tissue Engineering.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alann Thaffarell Portilho SouzaBone Research Lab, School of Dentistry of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Av do Café s/n, Ribeirão Preto, SP, 14040-904, Brazil.
Helena Bacha LopesBone Research Lab, School of Dentistry of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Av do Café s/n, Ribeirão Preto, SP, 14040-904, Brazil.
Gileade Pereira FreitasBone Research Lab, School of Dentistry of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Av do Café s/n, Ribeirão Preto, SP, 14040-904, Brazil.
Emanuela Prado FerrazDepartment of Maxillofacial Surgery, Prosthesis and Traumatology, School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Fabiola Singaretti OliveiraBone Research Lab, School of Dentistry of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Av do Café s/n, Ribeirão Preto, SP, 14040-904, Brazil.
Adriana Luisa Gonçalves AlmeidaBone Research Lab, School of Dentistry of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Av do Café s/n, Ribeirão Preto, SP, 14040-904, Brazil.
Denise WeffortBone Research Lab, School of Dentistry of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Av do Café s/n, Ribeirão Preto, SP, 14040-904, Brazil.
Marcio Mateus BelotiBone Research Lab, School of Dentistry of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Av do Café s/n, Ribeirão Preto, SP, 14040-904, Brazil.
Adalberto Luiz RosaBone Research Lab, School of Dentistry of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Av do Café s/n, Ribeirão Preto, SP, 14040-904, Brazil. adalrosa@forp.usp.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6495-2778
Universidade de São Paulo · BRUniversidade de Ribeirão Preto · BR

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 404318/2016-9Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior 00.889.834/0001-08Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2009/54142-5Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2015/21439-6
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe aim of this study was to evaluate the in vitro osteogenic potential of osteoblasts from neural crest-derived frontal bone (OB-NC) and mesoderm-derived parietal bone (OB-MS) and the bone formation induced by them when injected into calvarial defects. MATERIALS AND

methodsCalvarial bones were collected from newborn Wistar rats (3-day old) and characterized as frontal and parietal prior to OB-NC and OB-MS harvesting. The cells were cultured, and several parameters of osteoblast differentiation were evaluated. These cells, or PBS without cells (control), were locally injected into 5-mm rat calvarial defects (5 × 10

resultsThe characterization of frontal and parietal bones assured the different embryonic origin of both cell populations, OB-NC and OB-MS. The OB-NC presented higher proliferation while the OB-MS presented higher alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity, extracellular matrix mineralization and gene expression of runt-related transcription factor 2, Alp, bone sialoprotein and osteocalcin revealing their high osteogenic potential. µCT analysis indicated that there was higher amount of bone formation in defects injected with both OB-NC and OB-MS compared to the control. Moreover, the bone tissue formed by both cells displayed the same histological characteristics.

conclusionsDespite the distinct in vitro osteogenic potential, OB-NC and OB-MS induced similar bone repair in a rat calvarial defect model. Thus, osteoblasts, irrespective of their in vitro osteogenic potential linked to embryonic origins, seem to be suitable for cell-based therapies aiming to repair bone defects.

Indexed as

OsteogenesisWound HealingAnimalsAnimals, NewbornBiomarkersCell DifferentiationCell ProliferationCells, CulturedGene Expression RegulationOsteoblastsRats, WistarSkullX-Ray MicrotomographyBiomarkersBoneCell therapyMesodermNeural crestOsteoblast

Identifiers

PMID32078052
OpenAlexW3007802147

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.