ArticleCurrent microbiology2020
Exploring Probiotic Activity of Lactobacillus sp. Isolated from Indigenous Breeds of Cattle Milk and Fecal Samples in Bhatan Village, MH., IN.
Article in Current microbiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Screening of lactic acid bacteria from the milk of Sahiwal cows and characterization of their probiotic potential for preventing bovine mastitis.International microbiology : the official journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology · 2025Article
- Screening, Identification and Application of Lactic Acid Bacteria for Degrading Mycotoxin Isolated from the Rumen of Yaks.Microorganisms · 2024Article
- Characterization of aFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Functional Characterization of Lactobacillus plantarum Isolated from Cow Milk and the Development of Fermented Coconut and Carrot Juice Mixed Beverage.Current microbiology · 2023Article
- Identification and characterization of chlorine-resistant bacteria from water distribution sites of Mumbai.Archives of microbiology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Probiotics are defined as live organisms that are able to confer health benefits to the host by improving their intestinal microbial balance. In the last decade, there has been an increasing interest to reveal health benefits associated with them. The objective of this study was to isolate indigenous probiotic organisms and assess their probiotic activity and therapeutic characteristics. The isolates were identified as Lactobacillus fermentum (isolates 2, 4, 6, 7, 8, and 9), Lactobacillus salivarius (isolate 13), and Lactobacillus plantarum (isolates 32 and 36). Five isolates showed growth at pH 2.5, while all isolates could grow at pH 8.5. All isolates showed good growth upto 5% NaCl concentration while two isolates showed growth in 7% NaCl concentration. All the isolates were susceptible to most of the broad-spectrum antibiotics. Cell-free suspensions from the isolates showed antimicrobial activity against the tested strains of Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Salmonella typhi, and Staphylococcus aureus. Two of the isolates 32 and 36 showed good revival after long-term storage, without any change in the morphology. Hence among all the other isolates these two isolates could have a good marketable potential. These strains can further be formulated into a probiotic drink that can be used as a health supplement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.