ReviewMedizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin2020
Measuring organ dysfunction.
Review in Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Validation and Psychometric Evaluation of the Persian Version of the Nurse Intuition Patient Deterioration Scale: A Methodological Study.Nursing open · 2026Article
- [Most frequently used drugs in suicide attempts and their organic complications in a tertiary care hospital].Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2026Observational
- Unmasking the hidden aftermath: postintensive care unit sequelae, discharge preparedness, and long-term follow-up.Critical care science · 2024Review
- The relationship between transthoracic echocardiography and mortality in adult patients with multiple organ dysfunction syndrome: analysis of the MIMIC-III database.Annals of translational medicine · 2022Article
- Support vector machine deep mining of electronic medical records to predict the prognosis of severe acute myocardial infarction.Frontiers in physiology · 2022Article
- Insulin Resistance and Homeostatic Model Assessment in Critically Ill: Where do We Stand?Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The support of failing vital organ function, and the prevention of new injury, has been the primary goal of intensive care since its origins more than six decades ago. A primary focus on specific organ system support has led to the concept that the combined dysfunction of these systems represents a syndrome-the multiple organ dysfunction syndrome or MODS. A variety of tools have been developed to quantify the severity of MODS. This review summarizes the conceptual framework that shapes these, their uses as tools in the care and study of critically ill patients, and the issues that will need to be addressed in future refinements. (This article is freely available.).
Indexed as
Identifiers
32077983What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.