Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32077828›Full record

ArticleCurrent neuropharmacology2021

Therapeutic Strategies to Protect the Central Nervous System against Shiga Toxin from Enterohemorrhagic

Jorge Goldstein, Krista Nuñez-Goluboay, Alipio Pinto

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current neuropharmacology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli infection-related acute encephalopathy.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Role of Globotriaosylceramide in Physiology and Pathology.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2022
    Review
  13. Editorial: Shiga toxin-producingFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jorge GoldsteinUniversidad de Buenos Aires, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Instituto de Fisiología y Biofísica "Houssay" (IFIBIO), Laboratorio de Neurofisiopatología, Facultad de Medicina, Argentina.
Krista Nuñez-GoluboayUniversidad de Buenos Aires, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Instituto de Fisiología y Biofísica "Houssay" (IFIBIO), Laboratorio de Neurofisiopatología, Facultad de Medicina, Argentina.
Alipio PintoUniversidad de Buenos Aires, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Instituto de Fisiología y Biofísica "Houssay" (IFIBIO), Laboratorio de Neurofisiopatología, Facultad de Medicina, Argentina.
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas · ARUniversity of Buenos Aires · AR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Infection with Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) may cause hemorrhagic colitis, hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) and encephalopathy. The mortality rate derived from HUS adds up to 5% of the cases, and up to 40% when the central nervous system (CNS) is involved. In addition to the well-known deleterious effect of Stx, the gram-negative STEC releases lipopolysaccharides (LPS) and may induce a variety of inflammatory responses when released in the gut. Common clinical signs of severe CNS injury include sensorimotor, cognitive, emotional and/or autonomic alterations. In the last few years, a number of drugs have been experimentally employed to establish the pathogenesis of, prevent or treat CNS injury by STEC. The strategies in these approaches focus on: 1) inhibition of Stx production and release by STEC, 2) inhibition of Stx bloodstream transport, 3) inhibition of Stx entry into the CNS parenchyma, 4) blockade of deleterious Stx action in neural cells, and 5) inhibition of immune system activation and CNS inflammation. Fast diagnosis of STEC infection, as well as the establishment of early CNS biomarkers of damage, may be determinants of adequate neuropharmacological treatment in time.

Indexed as

Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coliEscherichia coli InfectionsShiga-Toxigenic Escherichia coliCentral Nervous SystemHumansShiga ToxinShiga Toxinbraincerebellumfluorescence microscopyHemolytic Uremic Syndromeimagesinflammationlipopolysaccharidesmicroglial cellsmicrovasculatureNeurodegenerationneuropharmacologyneuroprotectionoligodendrocytesreactive astrocytesShiga toxin 2transmission electron microscopy

Identifiers

PMID32077828
PMCPMC7903495
OpenAlexW3007780624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.