Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32077749›Full record

ReviewCancer biotherapy & radiopharmaceuticals2020

Realizing Clinical Trials with Astatine-211: The Chemistry Infrastructure.

Sture Lindegren, Per Albertsson, Tom Bäck, Holger Jensen, Stig Palm, Emma Aneheim

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer biotherapy & radiopharmaceuticals, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Current status of radionuclide therapy targeting PARP in cancer: challenges and prospects.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Ortho-functionalization of aScientific reports · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Novel astatine (European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Therapeutic efficacy ofChemical science · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sture LindegrenDepartment of Radiation Physics and Targeted Alpha Therapy Group, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Per AlbertssonDepartment of Oncology, Targeted Alpha Therapy Group, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Tom BäckDepartment of Radiation Physics and Targeted Alpha Therapy Group, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Holger JensenCyclotron and PET unit KF-3982, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Stig PalmDepartment of Radiation Physics and Targeted Alpha Therapy Group, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Emma AneheimDepartment of Radiation Physics and Targeted Alpha Therapy Group, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the consensus around the clinical potential of the α-emitting radionuclide astatine-211 (

Indexed as

CyclotronsAlpha ParticlesAstatineClinical Trials as TopicHumansNeoplasmsRadiation OncologyRadiopharmaceuticalsAstatineAstatine-211Radiopharmaceuticalsastatine-211targeted αtherapy

Identifiers

PMID32077749
PMCPMC7465635

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.