Trial reportLeukemia & lymphoma2020
Randomized phase 1 study of sequential ("primed") vs. concurrent decitabine in combination with cladribine, cytarabine, G-CSF, and mitoxantrone (CLAG-M) in adults with newly diagnosed or relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or other high-grade myeloid neoplasm.
Trial report in Leukemia & lymphoma, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- Case Report: Decitabine and venetoclax sequentially followed by FLAG-Ida and venetoclax with immediate allogeneic stem cell transplantation in newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia with chromosome 3 inversion/Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Decitabine as epigenetic priming with CLAG induce improved outcome of relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia in children.Clinical epigenetics · 2024Article
- A hybrid protocol CLAG-M, a possible player for the first-line therapy of patients with mixed phenotype acute leukemia. A Polish Adult Leukemia Group experience.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Pharmacological Small Molecules against Prostate Cancer by Enhancing Function of Death Receptor 5.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.