ArticleThe Journal of animal ecology2020
Social learning within and across predator species reduces attacks on novel aposematic prey.
Article in The Journal of animal ecology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- From whom do animals learn? A meta-analysis on model-based social learning.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2023Pooled it
- The flexibility of social learning and its conservation implications in mammals and beyond.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025Review
- Human culture is uniquely open-ended rather than uniquely cumulative.Nature human behaviour · 2025Review
- Social demonstration of colour preference improves the learning of associated demonstrated actions.Animal cognition · 2024Article
- Environmental harshness does not affect the propensity for social learning in great tits, Parus major.Animal cognition · 2024Article
- High temperatures are associated with reduced cognitive performance in wild southern pied babblers.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2023Article
- Article
- Chemical defense acquired via pharmacophagy can lead to protection from predation for conspecifics in a sawfly.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2022Article
- Article
- Social transmission in the wild can reduce predation pressure on novel prey signals.Nature communications · 2021Article
- Conspicuous animal signals avoid the cost of predation by being intermittent or novel: confirmation in the wild using hundreds of robotic prey.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2021Article
- Conspicuousness, phylogenetic structure, and origins of Müllerian mimicry in 4000 lycid beetles from all zoogeographic regions.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Hard to catch: experimental evidence supports evasive mimicry.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2021Article
- Seeing red? Colour biases of foraging birds are context dependent.Animal cognition · 2020Article
- The signal detection problem of aposematic prey revisited: integrating prior social and personal experience.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020Article
- Social learning within and across predator species reduces attacks on novel aposematic prey.The Journal of animal ecology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To make adaptive foraging decisions, predators need to gather information about the profitability of prey. As well as learning from prey encounters, recent studies show that predators can learn about prey defences by observing the negative foraging experiences of conspecifics. However, predator communities are complex. While observing heterospecifics may increase learning opportunities, we know little about how social information use varies across predator species. Social transmission of avoidance among predators also has potential consequences for defended prey. Conspicuous aposematic prey are assumed to be an easy target for naïve predators, but this cost may be reduced if multiple predators learn by observing single predation events. Heterospecific information use by predators might further benefit aposematic prey, but this remains untested. Here we test conspecific and heterospecific information use across a predator community with wild-caught blue tits (Cyanistes caeruleus) and great tits (Parus major). We used video playback to manipulate social information about novel aposematic prey and then compared birds' foraging choices in 'a small-scale novel world' that contained novel palatable and aposematic prey items. We expected that blue tits would be less likely to use social information compared to great tits. However, we found that both blue tits and great tits consumed fewer aposematic prey after observing a negative foraging experience of a demonstrator. In fact, this effect was stronger in blue tits compared to great tits. Interestingly, blue tits also learned more efficiently from watching conspecifics, whereas great tits learned similarly regardless of the demonstrator species. Together, our results indicate that social transmission about novel aposematic prey occurs in multiple predator species and across species boundaries. This supports the idea that social interactions among predators can reduce attacks on aposematic prey and therefore influence selection for prey defences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.