Observational studyEpilepsia2020
Development of a model to predict electroencephalographic seizures in critically ill children.
Observational study in Epilepsia, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03419260 (Electrographic Seizure Management and Neurobehavioral Outcomes in Critically Ill Children), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Electrographic Seizure Management and Neurobehavioral Outcomes in Critically Ill Children
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pediatric Intracerebral Hemorrhage Management-Consensus Statement of the International Pediatric Stroke Organization-Part 1: Acute Phase and Workup.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026Guideline
- Accuracy of Machine Learning in Detecting Pediatric Epileptic Seizures: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Pooled it
- Late-Onset Findings During Extended EEG Monitoring Are Rare in Critically Ill Children.Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society · 2025Article
- Review of Noninvasive Neuromonitoring Modalities in Children II: EEG, qEEG.Neurocritical care · 2023Review
- Neuromonitoring in Children with Cerebrovascular Disorders.Neurocritical care · 2023Review
- Leveraging electronic medical record-embedded standardised electroencephalogram reporting to develop neonatal seizure prediction models: a retrospective cohort study.The Lancet. Digital health · 2023Article
- Continuous electroencephalography in the intensive care unit: A critical review and position statement from an Australian and New Zealand perspective.Critical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine · 2023Article
- Multimodal monitoring including early EEG improves stratification of brain injury severity after pediatric cardiac arrest.Resuscitation · 2021Observational
- Machine learning models to predict electroencephalographic seizures in critically ill children.Seizure · 2021Observational
- Prediction of EEG Seizures in Critically Ill Children.Pediatric neurology briefs · 2020Article
- EEG monitoring duration to identify electroencephalographic seizures in critically ill children.Neurology · 2020Observational
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveElectroencephalographic seizures (ESs) are common in encephalopathic critically ill children, but ES identification with continuous electroencephalography (EEG) monitoring (CEEG) is resource-intense. We aimed to develop an ES prediction model that would enable clinicians to stratify patients by ES risk and optimally target limited CEEG resources. We aimed to determine whether incorporating data from a screening EEG yielded better performance characteristics than models using clinical variables alone.
methodsWe performed a prospective observational study of 719 consecutive critically ill children with acute encephalopathy undergoing CEEG in the pediatric intensive care unit of a quaternary care institution between April 2017 and February 2019. We identified clinical and EEG risk factors for ES. We evaluated model performance with area under the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC), validated the optimal model with the highest AUC using a fivefold cross-validation, and calculated test characteristics emphasizing high sensitivity. We applied the optimal operating slope strategy to identify the optimal cutoff to define whether a patient should undergo CEEG.
resultsThe incidence of ES was 26%. Variables associated with increased ES risk included age, acute encephalopathy category, clinical seizures prior to CEEG initiation, EEG background, and epileptiform discharges. Combining clinical and EEG variables yielded better model performance (AUC 0.80) than clinical variables alone (AUC 0.69; P < .01). At a 0.10 cutoff selected to emphasize sensitivity, the optimal model had a sensitivity of 92%, specificity of 37%, positive predictive value of 34%, and negative predictive value of 93%. If applied, the model would limit 29% of patients from undergoing CEEG while failing to identify 8% of patients with ES. SIGNIFICANCE: A model employing readily available clinical and EEG variables could target limited CEEG resources to critically ill children at highest risk for ES, making CEEG-guided management a more viable neuroprotective strategy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.