Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32077031›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2020

Carbon dynamics in three subtropical forest ecosystems in China.

Zhongrui Zhang, Quanlin Zhong, Dongliang Cheng, Zhiqun Huang, Chaobin Xu, Hua Yu, Shihong Xiao

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Zhongrui ZhangFujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Plant Ecophysiology, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou, 350007, Fujian Province, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0804-8343
Quanlin ZhongFujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Plant Ecophysiology, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou, 350007, Fujian Province, China. qlzhong@126.com.
Dongliang ChengFujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Plant Ecophysiology, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou, 350007, Fujian Province, China. chengdl02@aliyun.com.
Zhiqun HuangFujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Plant Ecophysiology, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou, 350007, Fujian Province, China.
Chaobin XuFujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Plant Ecophysiology, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou, 350007, Fujian Province, China.
Hua YuFujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Plant Ecophysiology, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou, 350007, Fujian Province, China.
Shihong XiaoGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Bio-Control for the Forest Disease and Pest, Guangdong Academy of Forestry, Guangzhou, 510520, Guangdong Province, China.
Fujian Normal University · CNGuangdong Academy of Forestry · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The carbon sequestration capacity of the forest ecosystem normally increases overage due to the carbon dynamic in below canopy and soil. The carbon dynamic is reflective of the forest characteristics and their interactions with climate, topographic, and soil conditions. In this study, we measured the carbon content and carbon density of canopy, shrub, understory vegetation, litter, and soil, and assessed carbon dynamics in three forest ecosystems (Cunninghamia lanceolate, Pinus massoniana, and Evergreen broad-leaved forests) with a combination of data from Fujian Provincial forest resource inventory. This study showed that the carbon content of the canopy layers increased over time, and the carbon content of the topsoil (0-30 cm) in the young forests was significantly higher than that in other age groups in Cunninghamia lanceolata forest and Pinus massoniana forest. Due to the carbon differences in the soil layer, the carbon stocks of the C. lanceolata forest and the P. massoniana forest declined from 1996 to 2007, but the carbon stocks of Evergreen broad-leaved forest increased. Besides, using the traditional carbon content coefficient (0.5) might underestimate the carbon sequestration potential of these forest ecosystems, especially for the mature forests. The coniferous forests displayed a short-term reduction in the carbon stocks of ecosystems between 10 and 20 years after afforestation, and the decline cannot be ignored in the carbon budget.

Indexed as

EcosystemCarbonCarbon SequestrationChinaForestsSoilTreesCarbonSoilCarbon contentCarbon sequestrationForest ecosystem typesSubtropical forest

Identifiers

PMID32077031
OpenAlexW3007637530

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.