ArticleJournal of thrombosis and thrombolysis2020
Increasing use of anticoagulants in Germany and its impact on hospitalization rates for genitourinary bleeding.
Article in Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Administrative data in pediatric critical care research-Potential, challenges, and future directions.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of the study was to compare nationwide time trends of prescribed oral anticoagulants (OAC) with the time trend of genitourinary bleedings (GUB) in Germany from 2005 through 2016. The annual numbers of hospitalized patients with GUB coded as "hematuria", "excessive, frequent and irregular menstruation", "postmenopausal bleeding" or "abnormal uterine and vaginal bleeding" were extracted from the nationwide hospitalization file by the Federal Bureau of Statistics. Hospitalization rates were age-standardized using the German standard population 2011. Defined daily doses (DDD) of prescribed anticoagulants among outpatients for the same calendar period were extracted from reports of the statutory health insurance drug information system. Based on DDD, drug treatment rates per 100,000 person years (py) were calculated. From 2005 to 2016, annual OAC treatment rates per 100,000 py increased by 135.8% (from 901.4 to 2125.9). Until 2011 direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) represented less than 0.1% of all OAC, but 49.9% in 2016. In the same period age-standardized rates of hospitalizations for hematuria increased continuously (annual change of 1.03 (95% CI 0.94-1.11) per 100,000 py), that of "postmenopausal" (- 1.93; 95% CI - 2.38 to - 1.49) or "excessive, frequent and irregular menstruation" decreased (- 1.25; 95% CI -1.62 to - 0.87) and that of "abnormal uterine and vaginal haemorrhage" remained almost unchanged. From all cases with hematuria 5.3% received at least 1 red blood cell concentrate (RBC) in 2005 and 8.2% in 2016 whereas all cases with the other three types of bleeding counted for 1.9% in 2005 and 3.8% in 2016. The time trends for GUB in all subgroups changed steadily and showed no effect of the disproportional increase of DAOCs until 2011. Our ecologic nationwide comparison of OAC treatment rates in outpatients and hospitalization rates for GUBs revealed that despite increasing OAC treatment rates from 2011 to 2016 the hospitalization rates for GUB showed steady annual changes unaffected by the increasing prescription rates of DOACs since 2011.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.