Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32076944›Full record

SynthesisEuropean journal of epidemiology2020

Dietary protein intake and all-cause and cause-specific mortality: results from the Rotterdam Study and a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies.

Zhangling Chen, Marija Glisic, Mingyang Song, Hamid A Aliahmad, Xiaofang Zhang, Alice C Moumdjian, Valentina Gonzalez-Jaramillo, Niels van der Schaft, Wichor M Bramer, Mohammad Arfan Ikram and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European journal of epidemiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 81 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
81citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
11.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

81 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 122 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

21 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Zhangling ChenDepartment of Epidemiology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. z.chen.1@erasmusmc.nl.
Marija GlisicDepartment of Epidemiology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Mingyang SongDepartment of Nutrition, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Hamid A AliahmadDepartment of Epidemiology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Xiaofang ZhangDepartment of Epidemiology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Alice C MoumdjianDepartment of Epidemiology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Valentina Gonzalez-JaramilloDepartment of Epidemiology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Niels van der SchaftDepartment of Epidemiology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Wichor M BramerMedical Library, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Mohammad Arfan IkramDepartment of Epidemiology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Trudy VoortmanDepartment of Epidemiology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. trudy.voortman@erasmusmc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2830-6813
Erasmus MC · NLHarvard University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evidence for associations between long-term protein intake with mortality is not consistent. We aimed to examine associations of dietary protein from different sources with all-cause and cause-specific mortality. We followed 7786 participants from three sub-cohorts of the Rotterdam Study, a population-based cohort in the Netherlands. Dietary data were collected using food-frequency questionnaires at baseline (1989-1993, 2000-2001, 2006-2008). Deaths were followed until 2018. Associations were examined using Cox regression. Additionally, we performed a highest versus lowest meta-analysis and a dose-response meta-analysis to summarize results from the Rotterdam Study and previous prospective cohorts. During a median follow-up of 13.0 years, 3589 deaths were documented in the Rotterdam Study. In this cohort, after multivariable adjustment, higher total protein intake was associated with higher all-cause mortality [e.g. highest versus lowest quartile of total protein intake as percentage of energy (Q4 versus Q1), HR = 1.12 (1.01, 1.25)]; mainly explained by higher animal protein intake and CVD mortality [Q4 versus Q1, CVD mortality: 1.28 (1.03, 1.60)]. The association of animal protein intake and CVD was mainly contributed to by protein from meat and dairy. Total plant protein intake was not associated with all-cause or cause-specific mortality, mainly explained by null associations for protein from grains and potatoes; but higher intake of protein from legumes, nuts, vegetables, and fruits was associated with lower risk of all-cause and cause-specific mortality. Findings for total and animal protein intake were corroborated in a meta-analysis of eleven prospective cohort studies including the Rotterdam Study (total 64,306 deaths among 350,452 participants): higher total protein intake was associated with higher all-cause mortality [pooled RR for highest versus lowest quantile 1.05 (1.01, 1.10)]; and for dose-response per 5 energy percent (E%) increment, 1.02 (1.004, 1.04); again mainly driven by an association between animal protein and CVD mortality [highest versus lowest, 1.09 (1.01, 1.18); per 5 E% increment, 1.05 (1.02, 1.09)]. Furthermore, in the meta-analysis a higher plant protein intake was associated with lower all-cause and CVD mortality [e.g. for all-cause mortality, highest versus lowest, 0.93 (0.87, 0.99); per 5 E% increment, 0.87 (0.78, 0.98), for CVD mortality, highest versus lowest 0.86 (0.73, 1.00)]. Evidence from prospective cohort studies to date suggests that total protein intake is positively associated with all-cause mortality, mainly driven by a harmful association of animal protein with CVD mortality. Plant protein intake is inversely associated with all-cause and CVD mortality. Our findings support current dietary recommendations to increase intake of plant protein in place of animal protein.Clinical trial registry number and website NTR6831, https://www.trialregister.nl/trial/6645.

Indexed as

DietMortalityAgedCardiovascular DiseasesCause of DeathCohort StudiesDietary ProteinsFemaleHealth SurveysHumansMaleMeatMiddle AgedNetherlandsNutritional StatusPlant ProteinsDietary ProteinsPlant ProteinsAll-cause mortalityCardiovascular mortalityCause-specific mortalityCohort studyDietary protein intake

Identifiers

PMID32076944
PMCPMC7250948
OpenAlexW3006816626

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.