Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32076938›Full record

ReviewCurrent reviews in musculoskeletal medicine2020

Amniotic Product Treatments: Clinical and Basic Science Evidence.

Hailey P Huddleston, Matthew R Cohn, Eric D Haunschild, Stephanie E Wong, Jack Farr, Adam B Yanke

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07709819 (A Nanoscopic Second Look Into the Knee Joint, What Have We Learned?), which is not on this map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07709819 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

A Nanoscopic Second Look Into the Knee Joint, What Have We Learned?

TypeinterventionalSponsorAngelina Vera MDRan2026 to 2029Enrolled15ConditionsMeniscal TearsArmsNanoscopic Arthroscopy of the Knee
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Rational Design of Immunomodulatory Hydrogels for Chronic Wound Healing.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2021
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hailey P HuddlestonDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Division of Sports Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, 1611 W. Harrison St, Suite 300, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
Matthew R CohnDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Division of Sports Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, 1611 W. Harrison St, Suite 300, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
Eric D HaunschildDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Division of Sports Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, 1611 W. Harrison St, Suite 300, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
Stephanie E WongDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Division of Sports Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, 1611 W. Harrison St, Suite 300, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
Jack FarrKnee Preservation and Cartilage Restoration Center, OrthoIndy, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Adam B YankeDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Division of Sports Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, 1611 W. Harrison St, Suite 300, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA. adam.yanke@rushortho.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewOrthobiologics, including amniotic products, have been gaining interest in the past decade for the treatment of various orthopedic conditions including osteoarthritis. However, the use of biologics is varied and is currently available with minimal oversight or regulation. This review will assess the current state of research that utilizes amniotic products both in vitro and in vivo. RECENT

findingsAmniotic tissue derivatives have been shown to have positive effects in animal models for a variety of conditions. Clinical trials are limited with mixed outcomes, yet some recent studies suggest the rationale for continued investigation. While amniotic products appear promising in numerous animal studies, human clinical trials are still lacking. Future studies are needed to assess whether amniotic products have a role in the treatment of osteoarthritis and other orthopedic pathologies.

Indexed as

Amniotic fluidAmniotic membraneAmniotic suspension allograftCartilageOsteoarthritis

Identifiers

PMID32076938
PMCPMC7174465

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.