Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32076916›Full record

SynthesisClinical rheumatology2020

Relative efficacy and safety of iguratimod monotherapy for the treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Sajan Shrestha, Jing Zhao, Changqing Yang, Jinping Zhang

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical rheumatology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sajan ShresthaNanjing Drum Tower Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, 321 Zhongshan Road, Nanjing, 210008, Jiangsu, China.
Jing ZhaoSchool of Basic Medicine and Clinical Pharmacy, China Pharmaceutical University, 639 Longmian Avenue, Jiangning, Nanjing, 211198, China.
Changqing YangSchool of Basic Medicine and Clinical Pharmacy, China Pharmaceutical University, 639 Longmian Avenue, Jiangning, Nanjing, 211198, China. ycq0315@yahoo.com.
Jinping ZhangNanjing Drum Tower Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, 321 Zhongshan Road, Nanjing, 210008, Jiangsu, China. zjp16500@163.com.
China Pharmaceutical University · CNNanjing Drum Tower Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study aims to compare the efficacy and the safety of the iguratimod with placebo and other disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in adults with rheumatoid arthritis.

methodsTwo authors independently searched and selected randomized controlled trials from Cochrane library, Medline (through Pubmed), and Chinese databases, and then assessed the risk of bias (using ROB 2 tool), and graded the certainty of evidence (using the GRADEpro GDT software). We applied the RevMan 5 software for performing meta-analyses of the final consensus data.

resultsWe identified 12 trials involving 1938 participants. Ten trials had an overall high risk of bias. Although iguratimod had superior efficacy than placebo, the incidence of adverse events was also higher. Inferring to non-inferiority analysis with other DMARD therapy (primarily comprising methotrexate), iguratimod is likely to result in similar treatment response (20% (OR 1.04, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.36), 50% and 70% improvement in American College of Rheumatology criteria) and functional ability at 24 weeks. Although the disease state was slightly better with iguratimod (MD - 0.55, 95% CI - 0.85 to - 0.25), a clinically important improvement was not achieved. Iguratimod may have lower C-reactive protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate values. Swollen joint count, tender joint count, pain intensity, and patient's and physician's global assessment of disease state may be comparable between the therapies. Both the therapies are likely to have similar odds (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.67 to 1.26) of adverse events.

conclusionOur evidence suggests that iguratimod may be considered a potential alternative to methotrexate to treat rheumatoid arthritis.Key Points• The Asia Pacific League of Association for Rheumatology (APLAR) has recommended that iguratimod may be used a first-line drug for rheumatoid arthritis in specific cases.• Patients on iguratimod may have similar treatment response, functional ability, disease state, and adverse event profile at 24 weeks compared with those on methotrexate.• Iguratimod may be considered a better alternative to methotrexate in RA patients having high CRP and ESR values.• Future clinical trials in diverse population comparing the efficacy and safety of iguratimod in monotherapy or combination therapy with DMARDs (other than methotrexate) are warranted.

Indexed as

Antirheumatic AgentsArthritis, RheumatoidBlood SedimentationChromonesC-Reactive ProteinHumansMethotrexateRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSulfonamidesTreatment OutcomeAntirheumatic AgentsChromonesC-Reactive ProteiniguratimodMethotrexateSulfonamidesIguratimodMeta-analysisMethotrexateRheumatoid arthritis

Identifiers

PMID32076916
OpenAlexW3008638236

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.