Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32076905›Full record

ArticleClinical & experimental metastasis2020

Sentinel node tumor burden in prediction of prognosis in melanoma patients.

Johanna Palve, Leea Ylitalo, Tiina Luukkaala, Juha Jernman, Niina Korhonen

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical & experimental metastasis, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Johanna PalveDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Tampere University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Teiskontie 35, 33521, Tampere, Finland. johanna.palve@pshp.fi.ORCID 0000-0001-7528-6312
Leea YlitaloDepartment of Dermatology, Skin Cancer Unit, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Tiina LuukkaalaResearch, Development and Innovation Center, Tampere University Hospital and Health Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
Juha JernmanDepartment of Pathology, Tampere University and Fimlab Laboratories, Tampere, Finland.
Niina KorhonenDepartment of Dermatology and Allergology, Tampere University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
Tampere University · FITampere University Hospital · FIHelsinki University Hospital · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent data have demonstrated no survival benefit to immediate completion lymph node dissection (CLND) for positive sentinel node (SN) disease in melanoma. It is important to identify parameters in positive SNs, which predict prognosis in melanoma patients. These might provide prognostic value in staging systems and risk models by guiding high-risk patients' adjuvant therapy in clinical practice. In this retrospective study of university hospital melanoma database we analyzed tumor burden and prognosis in patients with positive SNs. Patients were stratified by the diameter of tumor deposit, distribution of metastatic focus in SN, ulceration and number of metastatic SNs. These were incorporated in Cox proportional hazard regression models. Predictive ability was assessed using Akaike information criterion and Harrell's concordance index. A total of 110 patients had positive SN and 104 underwent CLND. Twenty-two (21%) patients had non-SN metastatic disease on CLND. The 5-year melanoma specific survival for CLND-negative patients was 5.00 years (IQR 3.23-5.00, range 0.72-5.00) compared to 3.69 (IQR 2.28-4.72, range 1.01-5.00) years in CLND-positive patients (HR 2.82 (95% CI 1.17-6.76, p = 0.020).The models incorporating distribution of metastatic focus and the largest tumor deposit in SN had highest predictive ability. According to Cox proportional hazard regression models, information criterions and c-index, the diameter of tumor deposit > 4 mm with multifocal location in SN despite of number of metastatic SN were the most important parameters. According to the diameter of tumor deposit and distribution of metastatic focus in SN, adequate stratification of positive SN patients was possible and risk classes for patients were identified.

Indexed as

Tumor BurdenAgedChemotherapy, AdjuvantFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLymphatic MetastasisLymph Node ExcisionMaleMelanomaMiddle AgedPrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentSentinel Lymph NodeMelanomaPrognosis in melanomaSentinel node-positiveSentinel node tumor burden

Identifiers

PMID32076905
PMCPMC7138780
OpenAlexW3008716724

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.