Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32076904›Full record

ArticleCommunity mental health journal2020

Italian Validation of the Screen for Cognitive Impairment in Psychiatry.

Martino Belvederi Murri, Federica Folesani, Silvia Costa, Anna Clara Morelli, Valentina Scillitani, Giuseppe Guaiana, Bruno Biancosino, Rosangela Caruso, Maria Giulia Nanni, Luigi Zerbinati and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Community mental health journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Psychometrics and diagnostics of Italian cognitive screening tests: a systematic review.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Martino Belvederi MurriInstitute of Psychiatry, Department of Biomedical and Specialty Surgical Sciences, University of Ferrara, Via Fossato di Mortara 64, 44121, Ferrara, Italy.
Federica FolesaniInstitute of Psychiatry, Department of Biomedical and Specialty Surgical Sciences, University of Ferrara, Via Fossato di Mortara 64, 44121, Ferrara, Italy. Federica.folesani@student.unife.it.ORCID 0000-0002-3479-6700
Silvia CostaInstitute of Psychiatry, Department of Biomedical and Specialty Surgical Sciences, University of Ferrara, Via Fossato di Mortara 64, 44121, Ferrara, Italy.
Anna Clara MorelliInstitute of Psychiatry, Department of Biomedical and Specialty Surgical Sciences, University of Ferrara, Via Fossato di Mortara 64, 44121, Ferrara, Italy.
Valentina ScillitaniInstitute of Psychiatry, Department of Biomedical and Specialty Surgical Sciences, University of Ferrara, Via Fossato di Mortara 64, 44121, Ferrara, Italy.
Giuseppe GuaianaDepartment of Psychiatry and Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
Bruno BiancosinoDepartment of Mental Health and Addictive Disorders, Health Trust, Ferrara, Italy.
Rosangela CarusoInstitute of Psychiatry, Department of Biomedical and Specialty Surgical Sciences, University of Ferrara, Via Fossato di Mortara 64, 44121, Ferrara, Italy.
Maria Giulia NanniInstitute of Psychiatry, Department of Biomedical and Specialty Surgical Sciences, University of Ferrara, Via Fossato di Mortara 64, 44121, Ferrara, Italy.
Luigi ZerbinatiInstitute of Psychiatry, Department of Biomedical and Specialty Surgical Sciences, University of Ferrara, Via Fossato di Mortara 64, 44121, Ferrara, Italy.
Scot E PurdonDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Luigi GrassiInstitute of Psychiatry, Department of Biomedical and Specialty Surgical Sciences, University of Ferrara, Via Fossato di Mortara 64, 44121, Ferrara, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cognitive impairments have profound implications for the management of severe mental disorders; however, they are rarely assessed in everyday clinical practice due to constraints in time, resource and expertise. Novel and short instruments, such as the Screen for Cognitive Impairment in Psychiatry (SCIP), which overcome such limitations are greatly needed. The study aims to assess the validity and reliability, among healthy subjects, of the Italian translation of the SCIP, a brief, accessible tool to detect cognitive impairments among individuals suffering from mental disorders, as the first step to validate the instrument in clinical settings. One-hundred and twenty healthy subjects completed two of the three alternative forms of the SCIP. Cronbach Alpha (0.70) supported the reliability of the SCIP scores. Correlation coefficients supported the test-retest reliability of the tool. Learning effects were observed despite the use of alternative forms. Factor analysis indicated a two-factor solution explaining 55.4% of the total variance: the first factor ("memory") loading for VLT-I and VLT-D and less for WMT; the second factor ("executive function") loading for VFT and PST and less for WMT. The study proved the validity and reliability of the Italian version of the SCIP as a reliable and simple instrument to screen for cognitive impairment in the general population.

Indexed as

Cognition DisordersCognitive DysfunctionPsychiatryHumansItalyNeuropsychological TestsReproducibility of ResultsBipolar disorderCognitionCognitive dysfunctionNeuropsychological testsSchizophreniaValidation

Identifiers

PMID32076904

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.