Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32076863›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2021

Comparative study of gasless endoscopic selective lateral neck dissection via the anterior chest approach versus conventional open surgery for papillary thyroid carcinoma.

Peiliang Lin, Faya Liang, Qian Cai, Ping Han, Renhui Chen, Zhiwen Xiao, Jingyi Wang, Xiaoming Huang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Endoscopic lateral neck dissectionFrontiers in surgery · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Peiliang Lin *Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Department of Otolaryngology, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, 33, Yingfeng Road, Guangzhou, 510289, Guangdong, China.
Faya Liang *Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Department of Otolaryngology, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, 33, Yingfeng Road, Guangzhou, 510289, Guangdong, China.
Qian CaiGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Department of Otolaryngology, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, 33, Yingfeng Road, Guangzhou, 510289, Guangdong, China.
Ping HanGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Department of Otolaryngology, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, 33, Yingfeng Road, Guangzhou, 510289, Guangdong, China.
Renhui ChenGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Department of Otolaryngology, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, 33, Yingfeng Road, Guangzhou, 510289, Guangdong, China.
Zhiwen XiaoGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Department of Otolaryngology, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, 33, Yingfeng Road, Guangzhou, 510289, Guangdong, China.
Jingyi WangGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Department of Otolaryngology, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, 33, Yingfeng Road, Guangzhou, 510289, Guangdong, China.
Xiaoming HuangGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Department of Otolaryngology, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, 33, Yingfeng Road, Guangzhou, 510289, Guangdong, China. hxming@mail.sysu.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0002-5859-533X
Sun Yat-sen University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough there has been increasing interest in aesthetical approaches for treating patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC), there have been no studies comparing the safety and effectiveness of gasless endoscopic selective lateral neck dissection (SLND) via the anterior chest approach (ACA) with that of conventional open surgery (OPEN) for papillary thyroid carcinoma.

methodsA total of 91 patients with PTC who underwent either gasless endoscopic thyroidectomy, central compartment neck dissection and SLND via the ACA or conventional open surgery between Nov. 2008 to Dec. 2018 were included. Primary outcomes and demographic data were compared between the two groups.

resultsThirty-one patients were in the ACA group and 60 were in the OPEN group. The ACA group was younger and had a longer operative time but less intraoperative hemorrhage (P < 0.001 for all). There were no differences in other clinicopathological features. During the median follow-up of 48 months (ACA group) and 35 months (OPEN group), no recurrence on US/CT was found. The patients in the ACA group had better cosmetic results assessed postoperatively.

conclusionIt appeared that gasless endoscopic selective lateral neck dissection via the anterior chest approach achieved comparable safety and effectiveness as conventional open surgery for PTC and resulted in better cosmetic results.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedEndoscopyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeck DissectionThyroid Cancer, PapillaryYoung AdultAnterior chest approachCosmeticEndoscopic thyroidectomyNeck dissectionPapillary thyroid carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID32076863
OpenAlexW3008121192

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.