Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32076856›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2021

Endoscopic drainage with local infusion of antibiotics to avoid necrosectomy of infected walled-off necrosis.

Jose Lariño-Noia, Daniel de la Iglesia-García, Jaime González-Lopez, Javier Díaz-Lopez, Fernando Macías-García, Rafael Mejuto, Adriano Quiroga, Violeta Mauriz, Andrea Jardí, Julio Iglesias-García and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Infected pancreatic necrosis-Current trends in management.Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jose Lariño-NoiaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital of Santiago de Compostela, C/Choupana S/N, 15706, Santiago de Compostela, Spain. joselarnoi@outlook.es.ORCID 0000-0003-4892-6702
Daniel de la Iglesia-GarcíaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital of Santiago de Compostela, C/Choupana S/N, 15706, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Jaime González-LopezDepartment of Pharmacy, University Hospital of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Javier Díaz-LopezDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital of Santiago de Compostela, C/Choupana S/N, 15706, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Fernando Macías-GarcíaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital of Santiago de Compostela, C/Choupana S/N, 15706, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Rafael MejutoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital of Santiago de Compostela, C/Choupana S/N, 15706, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Adriano QuirogaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital of Santiago de Compostela, C/Choupana S/N, 15706, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Violeta MaurizDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital of Santiago de Compostela, C/Choupana S/N, 15706, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Andrea JardíDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital of Santiago de Compostela, C/Choupana S/N, 15706, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Julio Iglesias-GarcíaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital of Santiago de Compostela, C/Choupana S/N, 15706, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
J Enrique Domínguez-MuñozDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital of Santiago de Compostela, C/Choupana S/N, 15706, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Universidade de Santiago de Compostela · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCurrent treatment of infected pancreatic necrosis (IPN) follows a step-up approach. Our group designed a step-up protocol that associates endoscopic drainage with local infusion of antibiotics through transmural nasocystic catheter. Aim of our study was to evaluate our step-up protocol for IPN in terms of proportion of patients avoiding necrosectomy.

methodsRetrospective analysis of patients admitted with acute pancreatitis (AP) between January 2015 and December 2018. The number of patients who responded to each therapeutic step were analysed: step 1, systemic antibiotics; step 2, endoscopic transmural drainage and local infusion of antibiotics; step 3, endoscopic necrosectomy.

results1158 patients with AP were included. 110 patients (8.4%) suffered from necrotising pancreatitis; 48 of them had IPN (42.6% of necrotising pancreatitis) and were treated with systemic antibiotics. Nineteen patients (39.6% of IPN) responded and did not required any invasive therapy. Six patients with IPN on systemic antibiotics died within the first 4 weeks of disease before step 2 could be applied. Urgent surgical necrosectomy in the first 4 weeks was performed in three additional patients. Endoscopic drainage and local antibiotic therapy was performed in the remaining 20 patients; 9 (45% of them) did well and 9 patients underwent necrosectomy (18.7% of IPN). Two patients died on drainage. Overall mortality of the total cohort of AP was 2.53%

conclusionsAddition of local infusion of antibiotics to endoscopic drainage avoids the need of necrosectomy in half of patients with IPN not responding to systemic antibiotics.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAnti-Bacterial AgentsDrainageEndoscopy, Digestive SystemFemaleHumansIntraabdominal InfectionsMaleMiddle AgedPancreatectomyPancreatitis, Acute NecrotizingRetrospective StudiesStentsTreatment OutcomeUltrasonography, InterventionalAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntibiotic resistanceCarbapenemEndoscopic necrosectomyEndosonographyPancreatitis

Identifiers

PMID32076856
OpenAlexW3009025303

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.