Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32076806›Full record

ArticleCurrent genetics2020

Regulation of the abundance of Y-family polymerases in the cell cycle of budding yeast in response to DNA damage.

Aleksandra Sobolewska, Agnieszka Halas, Michal Plachta, Justyna McIntyre, Ewa Sledziewska-Gojska

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current genetics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 51% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. E3 ubiquitin ligase RNF2 protects polymerase ι from destabilization.Biochimica et biophysica acta. Molecular cell research · 2024
    Article
  5. The putative error prone polymerasenpj antimicrobials and resistance · 2024
    Article
  6. Beyond the Lesion: Back to High Fidelity DNA Synthesis.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Aleksandra SobolewskaInstitute of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Polish Academy of Sciences, ul. Pawinskiego 5A, 02-106, Warsaw, Poland.
Agnieszka HalasInstitute of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Polish Academy of Sciences, ul. Pawinskiego 5A, 02-106, Warsaw, Poland.
Michal PlachtaInstitute of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Polish Academy of Sciences, ul. Pawinskiego 5A, 02-106, Warsaw, Poland.
Justyna McIntyreInstitute of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Polish Academy of Sciences, ul. Pawinskiego 5A, 02-106, Warsaw, Poland.
Ewa Sledziewska-GojskaInstitute of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Polish Academy of Sciences, ul. Pawinskiego 5A, 02-106, Warsaw, Poland. esg@ibb.waw.pl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8409-0864
Institute of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Polish Academy of Sciences · PL

Funding

Narodowe Centrum Nauki 2014/15/N/NZ1/01886
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Y-family DNA polymerases mediate DNA damage tolerance via translesion synthesis (TLS). Because of the intrinsically error-prone nature of these enzymes, their activities are regulated at several levels. Here, we demonstrate the common regulation of the cellular abundance of Y-family polymerases, polymerase eta (Pol eta), and Rev1, in response to DNA damage at various stages of the cell cycle. UV radiation influenced polymerase abundance more when cells were exposed in S-phase than in G1- or G2-phases. We noticed two opposing effects of UV radiation in S-phase. On one hand, exposure to increasing doses of UV radiation at the beginning of this phase increasingly delayed S-phase progression. As a result, the accumulation of Pol eta and Rev1, which in nonirradiated yeast is initiated at the S/G2-phase boundary, was gradually shifted into the prolonged S-phase. On the other hand, the extent of polymerase accumulation was inversely proportional to the dose of irradiation, such that the accumulation was significantly lower after exposure to 80 J/m

Indexed as

DNA DamageCell CycleCell Cycle ProteinsDNA-Directed DNA PolymeraseGene Expression Regulation, EnzymologicGene Expression Regulation, FungalHydroxyureaNucleotidyltransferasesRNA, MessengerSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsS PhaseUltraviolet RaysY-Family DNA PolymerasesCell Cycle ProteinsDNA-Directed DNA PolymeraseHydroxyureaMRC1 protein, S cerevisiaeNucleotidyltransferasesRad30 proteinrad9 proteinREV1 protein, S cerevisiaeRNA, MessengerSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsY-Family DNA PolymerasesDNA damage responsePolymerase etaRev1S. cerevisiaeS-phase checkpointY-family polymerases

Identifiers

PMID32076806
PMCPMC7363672
OpenAlexW3007291241

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.