Trial reportEuropean journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society2021
Tranexamic acid in traumatic brain injury: an explanatory study nested within the CRASH-3 trial.
Trial report in European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Therapeutic efficacy of tranexamic acid on traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Systemic hemostatic agents initiated in trauma patients in the pre-hospital setting: a systematic review.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2023Pooled it
- The European guideline on management of major bleeding and coagulopathy following trauma: sixth edition.Critical care (London, England) · 2023Guideline
- Understanding the neuroprotective effect of tranexamic acid: an exploratory analysis of the CRASH-3 randomised trial.Critical care (London, England) · 2020Trial
- Outcomes of combined carbazochrome sodium sulfonate plus tranexamic acid therapy versus tranexamic acid monotherapy in traumatic brain injury: a retrospective cohort study in Japan.Journal of intensive care · 2026Article
- Effect of tranexamic acid on intracranial haemorrhage and infarction in patients with traumatic brain injury: a pre-planned substudy in a sample of CRASH-3 trial patients.Emergency medicine journal : EMJ · 2021Article
- CRASH 3: a monumental effort with minimal gain.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2021Article
- Post-traumatic pulmonary embolism: incidence, physiopathology, risk factors of early occurrence, and impact outcome. A narrative review.American journal of cardiovascular disease · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe CRASH-3 trial is a randomised trial of tranexamic acid (TXA) on death and disability in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). It is based on the hypothesis that early TXA treatment can prevent deaths from post-traumatic intracranial bleeding. The results showed that timely TXA treatment reduces head injury deaths in patients with reactive pupils and those with a mild to moderate GCS at baseline. We examined routinely collected CT scans in a sample of 1767 CRASH-3 trial patients to explore if, why, and how patients are affected by TXA.
methodsThe CRASH-3 IBMS is an explanatory study nested within the CRASH-3 trial. We measured the volume of intracranial bleeding on CT scans using established methods (e.g. ABC/2).
resultsPatients with any un-reactive pupil had a median intracranial bleeding volume of 60 ml (IQR 18-101 ml) and patients with reactive pupils had a median volume of 26 ml (IQR 1-55 ml). Patients with severe GCS had median intracranial bleeding volume of 37 ml (IQR 3-75 ml) and patients with moderate to mild GCS had a median volume of 26 ml (IQR 0.4-50 ml). For every hour increase from injury to the baseline scan, the risk of new bleeding on a further scan decreased by 12% (adjusted RR = 0.88 [95% CI 0.80-0.96], p = 0.0047).
conclusionPatients with reactive pupils and/or mild to moderate GCS may have benefited from TXA in the CRASH-3 trial because they had less intracranial bleeding at baseline. However, because bleeding occurs soon after injury, treatment delay reduces the benefit of TXA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.