Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32076760›Full record

ReviewDer Nervenarzt2020

[A review of the update of the German S3-guideline on diagnostics and therapy of bipolar disorders 2019].

A Pfennig, B Soltmann, P Ritter, T Bschor, M Hautzinger, T D Meyer, F Padberg, P Brieger, M Schäfer, C U Correll and 1 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Nervenarzt, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

A PfennigKlinik und Poliklinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Deutschland. andrea.pfennig@uniklinikum-dresden.de.
B SoltmannKlinik und Poliklinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Deutschland.
P RitterKlinik und Poliklinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Deutschland.
T BschorAbteilung für Psychiatrie, Schlosspark-Klinik Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland.
M HautzingerFachbereich Psychologie, Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen, Tübingen, Deutschland.
T D MeyerDepartment of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, UT Health, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX, USA.
F PadbergPsychiatrische Klinik, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, München, Deutschland.
P Briegerkbo-Isar-Amper-Klinikum, Haar (München), Deutschland.
M SchäferKlinik für Psychiatrie, Psychotherapie und Psychosomatik und Suchtmedizin, Kliniken Essen-Mitte und Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland.
C U CorrellKlinik für Psychiatrie, Psychosomatik und Psychotherapie des Kindes- und Jugendalters, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland.
M BauerKlinik und Poliklinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since the first publication of the guideline in 2012, which included critically reviewed evidence up to 2010, several hundred articles with new evidence were published and some topics of the clinical consensus needed to be reconsidered. Therefore, it was urgently necessary to revise the guideline to bring them up to date. In this article important revisions and updates are presented and the chances and limitations of the development of the guidelines and their implementation are discussed.

Indexed as

Bipolar DisorderGuidelines as TopicGermanyHumansConsensusEvidenceEvidence-based psychiatryGuidelinesPsychiatric care

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.