Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32076745›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2020

Facilitators and barriers for performing comprehensive medication reviews and follow-up by multiprofessional teams in older hospitalised patients.

Thomas Gerardus Hendrik Kempen, Amanda Kälvemark, Maria Sawires, Derek Stewart, Ulrika Gillespie

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02999412 (Medication Reviews Bridging Healthcare), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02999412 nacompletednot on this map

Medication Reviews Bridging Healthcare: a Cluster-randomised Crossover Trial to Study the Effects of Hospital-initiated Comprehensive Medication Reviews, Including Active Follow-up, on Elderly Patients' Healthcare Utilisation

TypeinterventionalSponsorUppsala County Council, SwedenRan2017 to 2020Enrolled2,637ConditionsMedication ReviewArmsComprehensive medication review, Comprehensive medication review with active follow-up, Usual Care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Implementation science in care for older adults across healthcare settings: a scoping review.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Thomas Gerardus Hendrik KempenHospital Pharmacy Department, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden. thomas.kempen@medsci.uu.se.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5173-5005
Amanda KälvemarkHospital Pharmacy Department, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden.
Maria SawiresDepartment of Pharmaceutical Biosciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Derek StewartCollege of Pharmacy, Qatar University Health, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7360-8592
Ulrika GillespieHospital Pharmacy Department, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2181-4719
Uppsala University · SEQatar University · QAUppsala University Hospital · SE

Funding

Geriatric Fund (SE) N.a.Region Gävleborg CFUG-658451Region Gävleborg CFUG-698771Region Uppsala (SE) LUL-527721Region Uppsala (SE) LUL-614061Region Uppsala (SE) LUL-716201Region Västmanland (SE) LTV-675921Region Västmanland (SE) LTV-712341Region Västmanland (SE) LTV-736641Region Västmanland (SE) LTV-840112Riksförbundet HjärtLung (SE) FA 2017:38Riksförbundet HjärtLung (SE) FA 2018:43Sveriges Farmaceuter (SE) N.a.Thuréus Fund for Geriatric Research (SE) N.a.Uppsala-Örebro Regional Research Council (SE) RFR-555601Uppsala-Örebro Regional Research Council (SE) RFR-641791Uppsala-Örebro Regional Research Council (SE) RFR-735911
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThere is a lack of knowledge about factors that influence the performance of comprehensive medication reviews (CMRs) by multiprofessional teams in hospital practice. This study aimed to explore the facilitators and barriers for performing CMRs and post-discharge follow-up in older hospitalised patients from the healthcare professional perspective.

methodsPhysicians and ward-based pharmacists were recruited from an ongoing trial at four hospitals in Sweden. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 16 physicians and 7 pharmacists. Interview topics were working processes, resources, competences, medication-related problems, intervention effects and collaboration. The interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and thematically analysed using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Identified subthemes were categorised as facilitators or barriers and grouped into overarching main themes.

resultsIn total, 21 facilitators and 25 barriers were identified across all CFIR domains and grouped in 6 main themes: (a) CMRs and follow-up are needed, but not in all patients; (b) there is a general belief in positive effects; (c) lack of resources is an issue, although the performance of CMRs may save time; (d) pharmacists' knowledge and skills are valuable, but they need more clinical competence; (e) compatibility with hospital practice is challenging, and roles and responsibilities are unclear and (f) personal contact at the ward is essential for physician-pharmacist collaboration.

conclusionMultiple facilitators and barriers for performing CMRs and post-discharge follow-up in older hospitalised patients exist. These factors should be addressed in future initiatives with similar interventions by multiprofessional teams to ensure successful implementation and performance in hospital practice.

Indexed as

AftercareAgedComprehensive Health CareFollow-Up StudiesHumansMedication Therapy ManagementMiddle AgedHospital practiceImplementationMedication reviewsMultiprofessional collaborationOlder patientsQualitative

Identifiers

PMID32076745
PMCPMC7239809
OpenAlexW3007597821

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.