ArticleRadiology. Artificial intelligence2019
Improving Accuracy and Efficiency with Concurrent Use of Artificial Intelligence for Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
Article in Radiology. Artificial intelligence, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 88 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
88 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 228 citations in OpenAlex.
- Deep Learning Algorithms Versus Radiologists in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Breast Cancer Detection: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
- Facilitators and Barriers to Implementing AI in Routine Medical Imaging: Systematic Review and Qualitative Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Independent External Validation of Artificial Intelligence Algorithms for Automated Interpretation of Screening Mammography: A Systematic Review.Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR · 2022Pooled it
- Tomosynthesis and Synthesized-2D Breast AI Outputs in a Biopsy-Referred Cohort: A Diagnostic Study of Agreement and Incremental Decision-Support Value.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- Evaluating artificial intelligence-generated synthesized mammography as a standalone alternative to digital mammography with or without tomosynthesis.Japanese journal of radiology · 2026Article
- Noninferiority and Efficiency/Revenue Facilitation (NERF) Endpoints : Shifting Grounds of Argument in Health AI Interventional Studies.Journal of bioethical inquiry · 2026Article
- Impact of AI assistance on reading time, cancer detection rate, and abnormal interpretation rate in screening and diagnostic mammography: a prospective alternating-month study.European radiology · 2026Article
- Zero-Shot Domain Adaptation of 2D Mammography Lesion Detection Model for 3D Breast CT Malignancy Detection.Cancers · 2026Article
- Subgroup performance of a commercial digital breast tomosynthesis model for breast cancer detection.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Evaluation of the Diagnostic Accuracy of Comercially Available AI-CAD Solution in Mammography Screening in Mexican Women (Mammo-MX Database).Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- The evolution and future of point of care ultrasound in the perioperative period: narrative review.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence for breast cancer management.Communications medicine · 2026Review
- Performance of an Artificial Intelligence Support System on Screening Mammography Cases Proceeding to Stereotactic Biopsy.Cancers · 2025Article
- The Clinical Application of Artificial Intelligence in Breast Imaging: Current Insights, Challenges, and Future Directions.Journal of breast cancer · 2025Review
- The Screening Tomosynthesis Trial with Advanced Reader Methods (STREAM): design and rationale of a population-based breast cancer screening trial.European radiology · 2025Article
- Deep Learning with Transfer Learning on Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: A Radiomics-Based Model for Predicting Breast Cancer Risk.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Deep Learning in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Current Status, Challenges, and Future Trends.MedComm · 2025Review
- Optimizing Artificial Intelligence Thresholds for Mammographic Lesion Detection: A Retrospective Study on Diagnostic Performance and Radiologist-Artificial Intelligence Discordance.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Traditional versus modern approaches to screening mammography: a comparison of computer-assisted detection for synthetic 2D mammography versus an artificial intelligence algorithm for digital breast tomosynthesis.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2025Article
28 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate the use of artificial intelligence (AI) to shorten digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) reading time while maintaining or improving accuracy. MATERIALS AND
methodsA deep learning AI system was developed to identify suspicious soft-tissue and calcified lesions in DBT images. A reader study compared the performance of 24 radiologists (13 of whom were breast subspecialists) reading 260 DBT examinations (including 65 cancer cases) both with and without AI. Readings occurred in two sessions separated by at least 4 weeks. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), reading time, sensitivity, specificity, and recall rate were evaluated with statistical methods for multireader, multicase studies.
resultsRadiologist performance for the detection of malignant lesions, measured by mean AUC, increased 0.057 with the use of AI (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.028, 0.087;
conclusionThe concurrent use of an accurate DBT AI system was found to improve cancer detection efficacy in a reader study that demonstrated increases in AUC, sensitivity, and specificity and a reduction in recall rate and reading time.© RSNA, 2019See also the commentary by Hsu and Hoyt in this issue.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.