Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32076646›Full record

ArticleScience advances2020

Kinematic flexibility allows bumblebees to increase energetic efficiency when carrying heavy loads.

Stacey A Combes, Susan F Gagliardi, Callin M Switzer, Michael E Dillon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science advances, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The potential underlying mechanisms during learning flights.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Stacey A CombesDepartment of Neurobiology, Physiology and Behavior, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1586-6459
Susan F GagliardiDepartment of Neurobiology, Physiology and Behavior, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7538-1368
Callin M SwitzerDepartment of Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0901-169X
Michael E DillonDepartment of Zoology and Physiology and Program in Ecology, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY 82071, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7263-5537

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Foraging bees fly with heavy loads of nectar and pollen, incurring energetic costs that are typically assumed to depend on load size. Insects can produce more force by increasing stroke amplitude and/or flapping frequency, but the kinematic response of a given species is thought to be consistent. We examined bumblebees (

Indexed as

BeesBehavior, AnimalAnimalsModels, TheoreticalPlant NectarPollenPlant Nectar

Identifiers

PMID32076646
PMCPMC7002132

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.