Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32076642›Full record

ArticleScience advances2020

Coupling Cas9 to artificial inhibitory domains enhances CRISPR-Cas9 target specificity.

Sabine Aschenbrenner, Stefan M Kallenberger, Mareike D Hoffmann, Adrian Huck, Roland Eils, Dominik Niopek

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science advances, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Protective antigen-mediated delivery of an anti-CRISPR protein for precision genome editing.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Modulation of CRISPR-Cas9 Cleavage with an Oligo-Ribonucleoprotein Design.Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Structural basis of negative regulation of CRISPR-Cas7-11 by TPR-CHAT.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. CRISPR/Cas9 Landscape: Current State and Future Perspectives.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Mechanisms regulating the CRISPR-Cas systems.Frontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Review
  15. Application of CRISPR-Cas system in the diagnosis and therapy of ESKAPE infections.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sabine AschenbrennerSynthetic Biology Group, Institute for Pharmacy and Molecular Biotechnology (IPMB) and Center for Quantitative Analysis of Molecular and Cellular Biosystems (BioQuant), University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg 69120, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2260-3254
Stefan M KallenbergerDigital Health Center, Berlin Institute of Health (BIH) and Charité, Berlin 10178, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3783-0246
Mareike D HoffmannSynthetic Biology Group, Institute for Pharmacy and Molecular Biotechnology (IPMB) and Center for Quantitative Analysis of Molecular and Cellular Biosystems (BioQuant), University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg 69120, Germany.
Adrian HuckSynthetic Biology Group, Institute for Pharmacy and Molecular Biotechnology (IPMB) and Center for Quantitative Analysis of Molecular and Cellular Biosystems (BioQuant), University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg 69120, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1151-3891
Roland EilsDigital Health Center, Berlin Institute of Health (BIH) and Charité, Berlin 10178, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0034-4036
Dominik NiopekSynthetic Biology Group, Institute for Pharmacy and Molecular Biotechnology (IPMB) and Center for Quantitative Analysis of Molecular and Cellular Biosystems (BioQuant), University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg 69120, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7479-530X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The limited target specificity of CRISPR-Cas nucleases poses a challenge with respect to their application in research and therapy. Here, we present a simple and original strategy to enhance the specificity of CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing by coupling Cas9 to artificial inhibitory domains. Applying a combination of mathematical modeling and experiments, we first determined how CRISPR-Cas9 activity profiles relate to Cas9 specificity. We then used artificially weakened anti-CRISPR (Acr) proteins either coexpressed with or directly fused to Cas9 to fine-tune its activity toward selected levels, thereby achieving an effective kinetic insulation of ON- and OFF-target editing events. We demonstrate highly specific genome editing in mammalian cells using diverse single-guide RNAs prone to potent OFF-targeting. Last, we show that our strategy is compatible with different modes of delivery, including transient transfection and adeno-associated viral vectors. Together, we provide a highly versatile approach to reduce CRISPR-Cas OFF-target effects via kinetic insulation.

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas SystemsGene EditingGene TargetingRecombinant Fusion ProteinsCell LineCRISPR-Associated Protein 9Enzyme ActivationGenes, ReporterGenetic LociHumansKineticsModels, TheoreticalSubstrate SpecificityCRISPR-Associated Protein 9Recombinant Fusion Proteins

Identifiers

PMID32076642
PMCPMC7002122

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.