Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32076600›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cell and developmental biology2019

Forged by

Prakhar Bansal, Yuvabharath Kondaveeti, Stefan F Pinter

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cell and developmental biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. A haplotype-resolved view of human gene regulation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  5. Cdk8 and Hira mutations trigger X chromosome elimination in naive female hybrid mouse embryonic stem cells.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Essential Roles for RNA in Shaping Nuclear Organization.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2022
    Review
  8. Epigenetic patterns in a complete human genome.Science (New York, N.Y.) · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Prakhar BansalDepartment of Genetics and Genome Sciences, School of Medicine, UCONN Health, University of Connecticut, Farmington, CT, United States.
Yuvabharath KondaveetiDepartment of Genetics and Genome Sciences, School of Medicine, UCONN Health, University of Connecticut, Farmington, CT, United States.
Stefan F PinterDepartment of Genetics and Genome Sciences, School of Medicine, UCONN Health, University of Connecticut, Farmington, CT, United States.
University of Connecticut · USUConn Health · US

Funding

Mechanisms of escaping X chromosome inactivation and translation to X-linked diseaseR35GM124926 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT SCH OF MED/DNT · PI PINTER, STEFAN F. · 2017 to 2021
$2.0M
Contributions of sex chromosomal gene homologues to X monosomyR01HL141324 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT SCH OF MED/DNT · PI PINTER, STEFAN F. · 2018 to 2021
$1.6M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL141324NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM124926
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent efforts in mapping spatial genome organization have revealed three evocative and conserved structural features of the inactive X in female mammals. First, the chromosomal conformation of the inactive X reveals a loss of topologically associated domains (TADs) present on the active X. Second, the macrosatellite

Indexed as

chromatin loop extrusionchromosome conformationintellectual disabilitymacrosatelliteSMCHD1tandem repeatsX chromosome inactivationXIST

Identifiers

PMID32076600
PMCPMC6985041
OpenAlexW3002471907

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.