ArticleOpen heart2020
Performing percutaneous coronary interventions with predilatation using non-compliant balloons at high-pressure versus conventional semi-compliant balloons: insights from two randomised studies using optical coherence tomography.
Article in Open heart, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Optimal Lesion Preparation With Non-compliant Balloons for the Implantation of Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds (BVS) -OPRENBIS Study
The Value of IVL Compared To OPN Non-Compliant Balloons for Treatment of RefractorY Coronary Lesions (VICTORY) Trial - A Randomized, Multicenter, Non-inferiority Comparison of Shockwave Intravascular Lithotripsy (IVL) and the OPN Non-compliant Balloon for Treatment of Calcified and Refractory Coronary Lesions
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Stent Undersizing and Malapposition: Mechanical Causes of Acute and Late Stent Failure.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Management of Calcified Coronary Lesions-A Review of Plaque Modification Methods.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- The importance of post-dilatation during PCI: current evidence and future directions.Future cardiology · 2025Article
- Safety and efficacy of super-high pressure OPN balloon in patients with in-stent restenosis - an intra-coronary imaging-based observational study.Scientific reports · 2025Observational
- Safety aspects ofFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- Dedicated Balloon Techniques for Coronary Calcium Modification.Interventional cardiology (London, England) · 2024Review
- Clinical performance and safety of the Vector® percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty balloon catheter: A single-arm, multicenter, retrospective post-marketing clinical study.ARYA atherosclerosis · 2024Article
- Clinical Outcomes of a Non-Compliant Balloon Dilatation Catheter: MOZEC™ NC Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Post-PCI quantitative flow ratio predicts 3-year outcome after rotational atherectomy in patients with heavily calcified lesions.Clinical cardiology · 2022Article
- Case report: Right atrial appendage hybrid access to bailout a stuck stent from the inferior vena cava of a small child.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Article
- Metal free percutaneous coronary interventions in all-comers: First experience with a novel sirolimus-coated balloon.Cardiology journal · 2022Article
- Long-term outcomes after treatment of in-stent restenosis using the Absorb everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffold.Open heart · 2021Observational
- Adropin inhibits the phenotypic modulation and proliferation of vascular smooth muscle cells during neointimal hyperplasia by activating the AMPK/ACC signaling pathway.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Stent underexpansion is a predictor of in-stent-restenosis and stent thrombosis. Semi-compliant balloons (SCBs) are generally used for lesion preparation. It remains unknown whether routine predilatation using non-compliant balloons (NCBs) improves stent expansion in ordinary coronary lesions. Methods: The PREdilatation by high-pressure NC balloon catheter for better vessel preparation and Optimal lesion preparation with non-compliant balloons for the implantation of bioresorbable vascular scaffolds studies randomised patients presenting with stable coronary artery disease or non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction requiring stent implantation to lesion preparation using NCBs versus SCBs. Stent expansion index (SEI-minimal luminal area/mean luminal area on optical coherence tomography) and periprocedural complications were compared. Results: We enrolled 104 patients: 53 patients (54 lesions) vs 51 patients (56 lesions) to the NCB and SCB groups, respectively. Predilatation pressure was higher in the NCB group (24±7 atmospheres (atm) vs 14±3 atm, p<0.0001). Postdilatation using NCBs was performed in 41 (76%) lesions vs 46 (82%) lesions pretreated with NCBs versus SCBs (p=0.57). Similar pressures were used for postdilatation with NCB in both groups (23±8 atm vs 23±9 atm, p=0.65). SEI after stent implantation was 0.88±0.13 in the NCB vs 0.85±0.14 in the SCB group (p=0.18). After postdilatation, SEI increased to 0.94±0.13 in the NCB group vs 0.88±0.13 in the SCB group (p=0.02). No relevant complications occurred. Conclusions: In simple coronary lesions, predilatation/postdilatation with NCBs at high pressures appears to result in better scaffold and stent expansion. Using SCBs only for predilatation might lead to inadequate stent expansion and postdilatation with NCBs might only partially correct this. Predilatation and postdilatation using NCBs at high pressure is safe. Trial registration number: ClinicalTrials.gov no. NCT03518645.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.