ArticleEcology and evolution2020
Spatial and temporal patterns of environmental DNA detection to inform sampling protocols in lentic and lotic systems.
Article in Ecology and evolution, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- From eDNA to decisions using a multi-method approach to restoration planning in streams.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Simultaneous species detection and discovery with environmental DNA metabarcoding: A freshwater mollusk case study.Ecology and evolution · 2024Article
- Article
- A validated protocol for eDNA-based monitoring of within-species genetic diversity in a pond-breeding amphibian.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Detection of the Endangered Siamese Bat Catfish (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023Article
- Dual Detection of the Chytrid FungiJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Article
- Spatial and temporal patterns of environmental DNA detection to inform sampling protocols in lentic and lotic systems.Ecology and evolution · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The development of efficient sampling protocols for the capture of environmental DNA (eDNA) could greatly help improve accuracy of occupancy monitoring for species that are difficult to detect. However, the process of developing a protocol in situ is complicated for rare species by the fact that animal locations are often unknown. We tested sampling designs in lake and stream systems to determine the most effective eDNA sampling protocols for two rare species: the Sierra Nevada yellow-legged frog (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.