Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32076529›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2020

Evaluating the effectiveness of retention forestry to enhance biodiversity in production forests of Central Europe using an interdisciplinary, multi-scale approach.

Ilse Storch, Johannes Penner, Thomas Asbeck, Marco Basile, Jürgen Bauhus, Veronika Braunisch, Carsten F Dormann, Julian Frey, Stefanie Gärtner, Marc Hanewinkel and 12 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Disentangling the effects of multifunctional forestry practices on the abundances of birds and their invertebrate prey.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Ilse StorchChair of Wildlife Ecology and Management Faculty of Environment and Natural Resources University of Freiburg Freiburg Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3252-2036
Johannes PennerChair of Wildlife Ecology and Management Faculty of Environment and Natural Resources University of Freiburg Freiburg Germany.
Thomas AsbeckChair of Silviculture Faculty of Environment and Natural Resources University of Freiburg Freiburg Germany.
Marco BasileChair of Wildlife Ecology and Management Faculty of Environment and Natural Resources University of Freiburg Freiburg Germany.
Jürgen BauhusChair of Silviculture Faculty of Environment and Natural Resources University of Freiburg Freiburg Germany.
Veronika BraunischForest Research Institute of Baden-Württemberg (FVA) Freiburg Germany.
Carsten F DormannBiometry and Environmental System Analysis Faculty of Environment and Natural Resources University of Freiburg Freiburg Germany.
Julian FreyChair of Remote Sensing and Landscape Information Systems Faculty of Environment and Natural Resources University of Freiburg Freiburg Germany.
Stefanie GärtnerBlack Forest National Park Bad Peterstal-Griesbach Germany.
Marc HanewinkelChair of Forestry Economics and Forest Planning Faculty of Environment and Natural Resources University of Freiburg Freiburg Germany.
Barbara KochChair of Remote Sensing and Landscape Information Systems Faculty of Environment and Natural Resources University of Freiburg Freiburg Germany.
Alexandra-Maria KleinChair of Nature Conservation and Landscape Ecology Faculty of Environment and Natural Resources University of Freiburg Freiburg Germany.
Thomas KussForest Research Institute of Baden-Württemberg (FVA) Freiburg Germany.
Michael PregernigChair of Sustainability Governance Faculty of Environment and Natural Resources University of Freiburg Freiburg Germany.
Patrick PyttelChair of Silviculture Faculty of Environment and Natural Resources University of Freiburg Freiburg Germany.
Albert ReifChair of Site Classification and Vegetation Science Faculty of Environment and Natural Resources University of Freiburg Freiburg Germany.
Michael Scherer-LorenzenGeobotany Faculty of Biology Freiburg Germany.
Gernot SegelbacherChair of Wildlife Ecology and Management Faculty of Environment and Natural Resources University of Freiburg Freiburg Germany.
Ulrich SchramlForest Research Institute of Baden-Württemberg (FVA) Freiburg Germany.
Michael StaabChair of Nature Conservation and Landscape Ecology Faculty of Environment and Natural Resources University of Freiburg Freiburg Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0894-7576
Georg WinkelResilience Programme European Forest Institute Bonn Germany.
Rasoul YousefpourChair of Forestry Economics and Forest Planning Faculty of Environment and Natural Resources University of Freiburg Freiburg Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Retention forestry, which retains a portion of the original stand at the time of harvesting to maintain continuity of structural and compositional diversity, has been originally developed to mitigate the impacts of clear-cutting. Retention of habitat trees and deadwood has since become common practice also in continuous-cover forests of Central Europe. While the use of retention in these forests is plausible, the evidence base for its application is lacking, trade-offs have not been quantified, it is not clear what support it receives from forest owners and other stakeholders and how it is best integrated into forest management practices. The Research Training Group ConFoBi (Conservation of Forest Biodiversity in Multiple-use Landscapes of Central Europe) focusses on the effectiveness of retention forestry, combining ecological studies on forest biodiversity with social and economic studies of biodiversity conservation across multiple spatial scales. The aim of ConFoBi is to assess whether and how structural retention measures are appropriate for the conservation of forest biodiversity in uneven-aged and selectively harvested continuous-cover forests of temperate Europe. The study design is based on a pool of 135 plots (1 ha) distributed along gradients of forest connectivity and structure. The main objectives are (a) to investigate the effects of structural elements and landscape context on multiple taxa, including different trophic and functional groups, to evaluate the effectiveness of retention practices for biodiversity conservation; (b) to analyze how forest biodiversity conservation is perceived and practiced, and what costs and benefits it creates; and (c) to identify how biodiversity conservation can be effectively integrated in multi-functional forest management. ConFoBi will quantify retention levels required across the landscape, as well as the socio-economic prerequisites for their implementation by forest owners and managers. ConFoBi's research results will provide an evidence base for integrating biodiversity conservation into forest management in temperate forests.

Indexed as

Black ForestConFoBideadwoodforest ownershiphabitat treelandscapetranslational research

Identifiers

PMID32076529
PMCPMC7029101

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.