Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32076524›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2020

Seed mass, hardness, and phylogeny explain the potential for endozoochory by granivorous waterbirds.

Ádám Lovas-Kiss, Orsolya Vincze, Erik Kleyheeg, Gábor Sramkó, Levente Laczkó, Réka Fekete, Attila Molnár V, Andy J Green

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ádám Lovas-KissWetland Ecology Research Group Department of Tisza Research MTA Centre for Ecological Research-DRI Debrecen Hungary.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8811-1623
Orsolya VinczeWetland Ecology Research Group Department of Tisza Research MTA Centre for Ecological Research-DRI Debrecen Hungary.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5789-2124
Erik KleyheegSovon Dutch Centre for Field Ornithology Nijmegen The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8026-3887
Gábor SramkóMTA-DE 'Lendület' Evolutionary Phylogenomics Research Group Debrecen Hungary.
Levente LaczkóDepartment of Botany University of Debrecen Debrecen Hungary.
Réka FeketeDepartment of Botany University of Debrecen Debrecen Hungary.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9255-0012
Attila Molnár VDepartment of Botany University of Debrecen Debrecen Hungary.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7096-9579
Andy J GreenDepartment of Wetland Ecology Estación Biológica de Doñana EBD-CSIC Sevilla Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1268-4951

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Field studies have shown that waterbirds, especially members of the Anatidae family, are major vectors of dispersal by endozoochory for a broad range of plants lacking a fleshy fruit, yet whose propagules can survive gut passage. Widely adopted dispersal syndromes ignore this dispersal mechanism, and we currently have little understanding of what traits determine the potential of angiosperms for endozoochory by waterbirds. Results from previous experimental studies have been inconsistent as to how seed traits affect seed survival and retention time in the gut and have failed to control for the influence of plant phylogeny. Using 13 angiosperm species from aquatic and terrestrial habitats representing nine families, we examined the effects of seed size, shape, and hardness on the proportion of seeds surviving gut passage through mallards (

Indexed as

Anas platyrhynchosendozoochoryphylogenyretention timeseed dispersalseed traits

Identifiers

PMID32076524
PMCPMC7029096

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.