Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32076505›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2020

Hybridization patterns between two marine snails,

Diana Costa, Graciela Sotelo, Antigoni Kaliontzopoulou, João Carvalho, Roger Butlin, Johan Hollander, Rui Faria

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Diana CostaCIBIO-InBIO Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos Universidade do Porto Vairão Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6768-1240
Graciela SoteloCIBIO-InBIO Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos Universidade do Porto Vairão Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0577-6655
Antigoni KaliontzopoulouCIBIO-InBIO Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos Universidade do Porto Vairão Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7897-7204
João CarvalhoCIBIO-InBIO Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos Universidade do Porto Vairão Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1728-0075
Roger ButlinDepartment of Animal and Plant Sciences University of Sheffield Sheffield UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4736-0954
Johan HollanderDepartment of Biology Aquatic Ecology Unit Lund University Lund Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4207-2956
Rui FariaCIBIO-InBIO Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos Universidade do Porto Vairão Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6635-685X
Universidade do Porto · PTUniversity of Gothenburg · SEUniversity of Lisbon · PTWorld Maritime University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Characterizing the patterns of hybridization between closely related species is crucial to understand the role of gene flow in speciation. In particular, systems comprising multiple contacts between sister species offer an outstanding opportunity to investigate how reproductive isolation varies with environmental conditions, demography and geographic contexts of divergence. The flat periwinkles,

Indexed as

ecological speciationecotypesflat periwinklesgene flowgeographic contextintrogressionmale genitalianatural selectionreproductive isolationshell morphology

Identifiers

PMID32076505
PMCPMC7029087
OpenAlexW3000758678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.