Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32076499›Full record

ArticleJournal of tissue engineering

Nano-graphene oxide/polyurethane nanofibers: mechanically flexible and myogenic stimulating matrix for skeletal tissue engineering.

Seung Bin Jo, Uyanga Erdenebileg, Khandmaa Dashnyam, Guang-Zhen Jin, Jae-Ryung Cha, Ahmed El-Fiqi, Jonathan C Knowles, Kapil Dev Patel, Hae-Hyoung Lee, Jung-Hwan Lee and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of tissue engineering. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Muscle degeneration in chronic massive rotator cuff tears of the shoulder: Addressing the real problem using a graphene matrix.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Seung Bin JoInstitute of Tissue Regeneration Engineering (ITREN), Dankook University, Cheonan, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9929-8235
Uyanga ErdenebilegInstitute of Tissue Regeneration Engineering (ITREN), Dankook University, Cheonan, Republic of Korea.
Khandmaa DashnyamInstitute of Tissue Regeneration Engineering (ITREN), Dankook University, Cheonan, Republic of Korea.
Guang-Zhen JinInstitute of Tissue Regeneration Engineering (ITREN), Dankook University, Cheonan, Republic of Korea.
Jae-Ryung ChaDepartment of Nanobiomedical Science and BK21 PLUS NBM Global Research Center for Regenerative Medicine, Dankook University, Cheonan, Republic of Korea.
Ahmed El-FiqiInstitute of Tissue Regeneration Engineering (ITREN), Dankook University, Cheonan, Republic of Korea.
Jonathan C KnowlesDepartment of Nanobiomedical Science and BK21 PLUS NBM Global Research Center for Regenerative Medicine, Dankook University, Cheonan, Republic of Korea.
Kapil Dev PatelInstitute of Tissue Regeneration Engineering (ITREN), Dankook University, Cheonan, Republic of Korea.
Hae-Hyoung LeeInstitute of Tissue Regeneration Engineering (ITREN), Dankook University, Cheonan, Republic of Korea.
Jung-Hwan LeeInstitute of Tissue Regeneration Engineering (ITREN), Dankook University, Cheonan, Republic of Korea.
Hae-Won KimInstitute of Tissue Regeneration Engineering (ITREN), Dankook University, Cheonan, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6400-6100
Dankook University · KREastman Dental Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For skeletal muscle engineering, scaffolds that can stimulate myogenic differentiation of cells while possessing suitable mechanical properties (e.g. flexibility) are required. In particular, the elastic property of scaffolds is of importance which helps to resist and support the dynamic conditions of muscle tissue environment. Here, we developed highly flexible nanocomposite nanofibrous scaffolds made of polycarbonate diol and isosorbide-based polyurethane and hydrophilic nano-graphene oxide added at concentrations up to 8%. The nano-graphene oxide incorporation increased the hydrophilicity, elasticity, and stress relaxation capacity of the polyurethane-derived nanofibrous scaffolds. When cultured with C2C12 cells, the polyurethane-nano-graphene oxide nanofibers enhanced the initial adhesion and spreading of cells and further the proliferation. Furthermore, the polyurethane-nano-graphene oxide scaffolds significantly up-regulated the myogenic mRNA levels and myosin heavy chain expression. Of note, the cells on the flexible polyurethane-nano-graphene oxide nanofibrous scaffolds could be mechanically stretched to experience dynamic tensional force. Under the dynamic force condition, the cells expressed significantly higher myogenic differentiation markers at both gene and protein levels and exhibited more aligned myotubular formation. The currently developed polyurethane-nano-graphene oxide nanofibrous scaffolds, due to their nanofibrous morphology and high mechanical flexibility, along with the stimulating capacity for myogenic differentiation, are considered to be a potential matrix for future skeletal muscle engineering.

Indexed as

graphene oxidemechanical stretchMyogenic differentiationnanofiberpolyurethane

Identifiers

PMID32076499
PMCPMC7001895
OpenAlexW3002908708

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.